Exchanges - Betfair Turnovers

[Tlalok07]

Hi my first post? I have been dealing with performance drops for a while but being a little irrelevant to most of them here can you explain what the number in brackets is? which also affects performance, are the money packages falling into that performance the maximum amount of money left unmatched in that performance? Thanks in advance

 

[anon]

The amount that is unmatched in that performance.

 

[Tlalok07]

The amount that is unmatched in that performance.

First of all, because you are the first one to answer, I would like to ask two more questions (sorry for swelling but trying to get away)
So the higher the number in brackets than the other points, the higher the betting intensity? how many unmatched can one see from the betfair site? do you have any idea for a site that offers in-play unmatched bets and other under over ht purchases etc?

 

[grace_kelly]

In short and filthy brothel. Random example because it's ongoing and because of virus it doesn't have many fights.

The "blue" backs are what you can bet. The "pink" Lay are the ones you can "counter". In the current example you can bet on the victory of Evloev @ 3.55 up to 134 pounds (to see the chart with the other -lower than 3.55- prices you can bet you must be logged), and on the victory of Mokrousov 48 pounds @ 1.32 . Now if you want to bet 344 pounds @ 1.39 the guy, as soon as you press it he will get it in the "red" which means that you ask to bet this amount if they give you this odds. If you now press the "red" @ 1.39 for 100 pounds, you book it. That is, you risk 39 pounds in case you lose, to win a net 100 pounds in case you win (from your account when you do the action, the 39 pounds will be deducted after you risk them).

Now in this case, as you understand, someone thinks that Maxim will win, so on the one hand he asks him for a bet @ 1.39 and on the other hand he "gives / books" evloev @ 3.55. Either one way (back Maxim) or the other (Lay evloev) in favor of maxim will have actually bet, just the turnover will have "written" at a different point. So in a match where you want to bet over 2.5 goals, for example, you can do it with Lay at under 2.5 if the price is in your favor. And the "turnover" to record as under while you in favor of the over. Ok, I confused you. Let someone else explain them better.

 

[Tlalok07]

I understood approximately what you mean so the numbers below the odds are the max bet in essence in this odds, the issue with lay is that if the odds you lay are 1.39 and you bet 100 pounds you will get 139 but if you lose how much you will do you have to pay the one you "booked"? I also wanted to ask some more general questions do you have a site to suggest with betting percentages or betting volume? I do not even ask why from what I understand only betfair and the other exchanges would leave something like that

 

[grace_kelly]

I understood approximately what you mean so the numbers below the odds are the max bet in essence in this odds, the issue with lay is that if the odds you lay are 1.39 and you bet 100 pounds you will get 139 but if you lose how much you will do you have to pay the one you "booked"? I also wanted to ask some more general questions do you have a site to suggest with betting percentages or betting volume? I do not even ask why from what I understand only betfair and the other exchanges would leave something like that

You don't bet 100 pounds. Let's say more correctly you are asking to win 100 pounds. You risk the 39, you will lose them if the choice is verified. Think you are bet365 and give me the customer's 1.39 odds of winning. I bet you 100e on that. If this one loses, you crush the 100 and I lose the 100. If you win that, you get me back 139e. That is, my 100 bets plus 39s of net profit. So think about it so you don't get confused. In lay you become the book

 

[grace_kelly]

To check what you learned, tell me what score do you think this neat bunch ended ??

 

[V1301]

View attachment 28400



View attachment 28401


To check what you learned, tell me what score do you think this neat bunch ended ??

Grace, can you explain how you interpret the unmatched amounts under the odds? With what reasoning, let's say, does the bunch "stink"? (which really stinks to be fair)

 

[grace_kelly]

It is 4-4 in 92 'and people ask to bet the double @ 1.90 with 807 euros while there is the possibility to bet 106 euros in the tie @ 2.46
So even before they ask 2911 euros to play double @ 1.75 at the same time that the interest for the ace and the draw is 21 and 18 euros respectively. That is, what else to discuss, the more obvious setup you die.
However I do not bother looking for suspicious games from the cash flow at the exchange, so I can not guide you further

 

[V1301]

Needless to say, the bunch ended up 4-5 with a goal by Gorky in 94 ', so the bets were confirmed ... Do you think that betfair and the exchanges in general are "nailed" with something like this "bunches"? from predictions he must have his eyes open and on bets, dropping odds, etc if he wants to win? This example you brought above in combination with something "guys" (until recently I characterized them that way) who advertise that they know about bets and money flow in games has bothered me a lot and I have started looking for the topic ...

 

[grace_kelly]

Needless to say, the bunch ended up 4-5 with a goal by Gorky in 94 ', so the bets were confirmed ... Do you think that betfair and the exchanges in general are "nailed" with something like this "bunches"? from predictions he must have his eyes open and on bets, dropping odds, etc if he wants to win? This example you brought above in combination with something "guys" (until recently I characterized them that way) who advertise that they know about bets and money flow in games has bothered me a lot and I have started looking for the topic ...

If you mean "little guys" you mean a clumsy guy whose last name refers to the ex-wife of a social media TV personality who was in the mid-00s and another long-haired "humorist" nicknamed with a chain of small supermarkets and a former center-left His "success" is an interview with Giovanni, I hope you are rich enough not to miss the -lots- money that you will lose. I hope I helped somehow. good morning

 

[V1301]

Brother, of course, and I am not going to give a dime to guys like them, what interests me is if there is REALLY something that they claim exists - IF it certainly exists and they do NOT have it. My curiosity lies there and people like you, Ganian, Santou and 2-3 other people I'm sure they know a lot more about me than the pleb of the bet. Good morning too

 

[grace_kelly]

There is. Or rather it existed, because now in the exchanges there are so many fake money flow that are not verified that makes this tactic unprofitable.

 

[V1301]

Are you referring to match crossing? You know a lot more about it than me, however the example you mentioned above with gorky is great and representative of what is played with bets and high volume stakes in the world of betting ...

 

[grace_kelly]

Obviously there are still barking cases like the one mentioned above, but after Gorky - who was even bet on by the cleaners at BF's offices - you would see 2 other similar cases that while "photographing" a point or number of goals would never be confirmed. So the sum would come out negative. As everything in life evolves, so does betting. There are now so many sharp bettors and the measures that companies have taken (from not allowing scroll accounts, until purchases disappear and you are limited in a blink of an eye) which is much, much, much harder to make money than in the old days - and when I say "old years" I mean only 4-5 years back, no 15-20.

 

[V1301]

In fact ... so in the end what do you have to do? To pay attention to money flow, turnovers, odd movement, etc or to turn your attention to other criteria? Really, how can a player be "trained" not to be lame 100% (because the fact that you are sucked by you is caught by you , the issue is to take out your cat)

 

[V1301]

If you think that the discussion escapes here in the public, I can give you my personal email and we can exchange opinions from there. Oh, you and the Mods think so.

 

[grace_kelly]

If you think that the discussion escapes here in the public, I can give you my personal email and we can exchange opinions from there. Oh, you and the Mods think so.

I added you to the group chat.

 

[Water resistant]

how to become someone who is interested in learning more?

 

[grace_kelly]

how to become someone who is interested in learning more?

Are you referring to me ??