The percentage among citizens that a patient has even a relationship with betting or number games is about 25%.
But everyone else is against it and surely a gallop that everyone would participate in and not just the bettors would show that. They will say "bravo Nepal, bravo Kathmandu", which they forbid there as is well known.
Why is this happening?
It is done because there is a risk of losing property and a risk of addiction.
They believe this even though the reality is somewhat different.
I will start with the history of betting.
In ancient times bettors were the Egyptians who had invented the quinoa and the deck.
The Egyptians were playing a game of stealth and the Roman emperors were chasing them.
Both the pagan emperors and the Christians occasionally sent legions to enforce order.
But that was not enough to make gambling disappear.
In the 18th century there were also Monaco casinos and a racetrack in England where they played.
Nowadays, of course, everything exists, in Europe at least, but it is a stealth game since the state allows the bucks to steal.
Those who are most opposed to betting are:
- Taliban, Ayatollah Khomeini, bible belt
- communes for obvious reasons (although they are recipients of suitcases from OPAP)
In our country, these two major categories have degenerated into buzzwords, of OPAP and Melissanidis.
Their goal is not to "protect". It is on the one hand to put ... taxes on the bet already taxed by his mother but also to accept the suitcases.
But what is really true and why?
For "loss of property" and "addiction" it is true that these exist as risks in every human activity.
When we say to each, we mean to each.
But the bet is isolated and blamed for them.
Why is it isolated?
Because betting is certainly not a productive activity. It does not belong to them.
Betting is not like potatoes.
Buying and selling potatoes can lead to property loss and addiction. But it does not catch.
The purchase and sale of potatoes can be done honestly, it can be done with a hat from the potato traders, it can also be done with a sombrero. But still not caught.
Buying and selling potatoes is a social task - we offer the potato to the people.
Betting is a game of hope.
It gives a way out of hope.
With a million drachmas, which was neither impossible nor extremely unlikely, you bought a studio apartment in Areos field and got away from the rent.
But what happens?
It turns out that book - global conspiracy 666 - Syriza and KKE want to deprive us of this hope as well.
This happens.
But everyone else is against it and surely a gallop that everyone would participate in and not just the bettors would show that. They will say "bravo Nepal, bravo Kathmandu", which they forbid there as is well known.
Why is this happening?
It is done because there is a risk of losing property and a risk of addiction.
They believe this even though the reality is somewhat different.
I will start with the history of betting.
In ancient times bettors were the Egyptians who had invented the quinoa and the deck.
The Egyptians were playing a game of stealth and the Roman emperors were chasing them.
Both the pagan emperors and the Christians occasionally sent legions to enforce order.
But that was not enough to make gambling disappear.
In the 18th century there were also Monaco casinos and a racetrack in England where they played.
Nowadays, of course, everything exists, in Europe at least, but it is a stealth game since the state allows the bucks to steal.
Those who are most opposed to betting are:
- Taliban, Ayatollah Khomeini, bible belt
- communes for obvious reasons (although they are recipients of suitcases from OPAP)
In our country, these two major categories have degenerated into buzzwords, of OPAP and Melissanidis.
Their goal is not to "protect". It is on the one hand to put ... taxes on the bet already taxed by his mother but also to accept the suitcases.
But what is really true and why?
For "loss of property" and "addiction" it is true that these exist as risks in every human activity.
When we say to each, we mean to each.
But the bet is isolated and blamed for them.
Why is it isolated?
Because betting is certainly not a productive activity. It does not belong to them.
Betting is not like potatoes.
Buying and selling potatoes can lead to property loss and addiction. But it does not catch.
The purchase and sale of potatoes can be done honestly, it can be done with a hat from the potato traders, it can also be done with a sombrero. But still not caught.
Buying and selling potatoes is a social task - we offer the potato to the people.
Betting is a game of hope.
It gives a way out of hope.
With a million drachmas, which was neither impossible nor extremely unlikely, you bought a studio apartment in Areos field and got away from the rent.
But what happens?
It turns out that book - global conspiracy 666 - Syriza and KKE want to deprive us of this hope as well.
This happens.
Last edited:
