Why do we lose in football betting?

[cosmicsports]

I ask this question to provoke a reflection and I will focus first on predicting the end result, the 90th minute.
It is the basic betting market and it is the one we all started with.
So why do we lose?
The reasons are various.
One obvious reason is if we make the wrong choices. He plays e.g. Olympiacos - Kastoria and we bet on the double.
An equally obvious cause is ... the ball itself - because the ball is a ball.
But there are others:

a) The group we bet on is suddenly deformed.
b) The team we bet on is indifferent (although most of us make a fuss about the indifferent and don't play them).
c) The refereeing (although with the VAR the referee can no longer do what he wants so much).
d) Various settings, from the players to help the other team, from the players to get them from the bookies, from the bookies to make good money.

How do we get rid of them?
We do not escape.
But do we bet on other markets to become less vulnerable to α-β-γ-δ?
An exact score can be set, of course, but isn't it less likely that the various factors that set results will deal with this thing? Probably it is.
Then if I bet e.g. Overt, even if Manchester United is deformed, is it going to say that it will spoil the over? Maybe but not instantaneously, as with betting on the team's victory.

The most common game that we don't take the place of a team is the over-the-counter.
It has low odds if we play alone but there are others, such as half-time overtures, corners and various other exotic.

First of all, of course, a check must be made on the rake holders that hold them.
Because if 90 minutes lasts 5% and the various exotic ones hold 15%, that's a handicap.
But I don't care if playing exotic markets gives us more stability in our game.

What is your opinion?








-

 

[betover]

Good evening ... I will say my opinion because it is an issue that has preoccupied me lately.
The reason we lose is the duration ... the constant preoccupation with betting ... is that we play all day ... instead, half a day .... instead of a lot of bets a day.
So if we assume that we have a good inspiration - select and win instead of winning one more ... we continue to bet resulting in losing all or part of the profits.
I will not deal with setbacks (regardless of the fact that they exist) because I will get into the hole of the type ... I won so I tore them, I lost so it was set up.
I can't believe that we can't find a match that will pass ... if it doesn't pass today it will pass tomorrow etc etc so with the appropriate system we will have a profit but if we play all day it is mathematically certain that we will be lost.

Ok rake .... low yields ..... etc ... everything is inside but unfortunately one or two bets a day is not enough for us ... we want to take them today ..... and tell me we have right ... since I've been lost for so many years a few thousand euros ... when will I get them back .. ???

Unfortunately, this is also the issue that we are losing because we have lost so much all these years that we want our reef but it is not easy ... I would say it is very, very difficult to repay.

If someone with our knowledge ... started today with zero lost (after starting today) he would play better and win ... he would not chase the lost .... he would not make so many mistakes that we have made.

This is the view of 16 years of online betting ... (many hardworking children) and the result is NOT !!!!!

Many systems ... many statistics ... tools ..many ... why don't we win ????
It wasn't their fault ... it's the fault of the duration and the hunt of the lost.

 

[cosmicsports]

Good evening ... I will say my opinion because it is an issue that has preoccupied me lately.
The reason we lose is the duration ... the constant preoccupation with betting ... is that we play all day ... instead, half a day .... instead of a lot of bets a day.
So if we assume that we have a good inspiration - select and win instead of winning one more ... we continue to bet resulting in losing all or part of the profits.
I will not deal with setbacks (regardless of the fact that they exist) because I will get into the hole of the type ... I won so I tore them, I lost so it was set up.
I can't believe that we can't find a match that will pass ... if it doesn't pass today it will pass tomorrow etc etc so with the appropriate system we will have a profit but if we play all day it is mathematically certain that we will be lost.

Ok rake .... low yields ..... etc ... everything is inside but unfortunately one or two bets a day is not enough for us ... we want to take them today ..... and tell me we have right ... since I've been lost for so many years a few thousand euros ... when will I get them back .. ???

Unfortunately, this is also the issue that we are losing because we have lost so much all these years that we want our reef but it is not easy ... I would say it is very, very difficult to repay.

If someone with our knowledge ... started today with zero lost (after starting today) he would play better and win ... he would not chase the lost .... he would not make so many mistakes that we have made.

This is the view of 16 years of online betting ... (many hardworking children) and the result is NOT !!!!!

Many systems ... many statistics ... tools ..many ... why don't we win ????
It wasn't their fault ... it's the fault of the duration and the hunt of the lost.

The sport is difficult.
I don't know how old you are, but I first met him in England when I was a student in 1975. At that time, however, I rarely attended or played, so he didn't get caught.
As if we were a systematic player from 1994 onwards when the illegal ones appeared in Greece (they appeared for the first time in May 1994!) But I already knew from the PROPO that I was playing during the 80's that the sport is difficult.
Is it difficult because with what qualifications each of us is better than the others?
Basically each of us goes to get the money. The booklet or the mutual fund collects its money
world and redistributes them. It does nothing else.
So with what qualifications does each of us have all the others, who also read, search, etc.?
But we are trying - just like a small and medium-sized team is trying to get Europe out one day.
In any case, this is not my point here. It is the comparison between predicting a final - exotic.

 

[probet2]

I think the end result is more difficult to predict due to 90 minutes and that is because it is a triple choice. Prefer under over or handicap for more chances of winning.
But in the end, if the odds aren't worth it, or you're mismanaging a cellar, you'll be lost in the long run no matter what you play.
I hope I helped.

 

[cosmicsports]

I think the end result is more difficult to predict due to 90 minutes and that is because it is a triple choice. Prefer under over or handicap for more chances of winning.
But in the end, if the odds aren't worth it, or you're mismanaging a cellar, you'll be lost in the long run no matter what you play.
I hope I helped.

Of course, we are talking about equal and similar situations in terms of rake. Otherwise we say nothing.
But what do you mean by handicap? If I play handicap, does it not mean that I bet on one team? E.g. "Bayern handicap -1" for me means a victory for Bayern with a difference of two goals or more. I bet Bayern, I'm not neutral.
Any other purchases anyway you prefer?