The OPAPP is opposed to OPAP

BetLaden

IFC # 6 Champion 2009-10, IFC # 1 Super Cup winner 200
Staff member
13 and 2002
39,137
26,154
113
52
Infobeto Town
www.infobeto.com
PRESS RELEASE 12/1/2017

Colleagues,

The future of our industry has reached a tipping point. Since yesterday. After the OPAP-POEPPP meeting, the rupture in the company's relations with the agents is a given as OPAP SA wants to unilaterally impose new contracts and change-reduce our supply.

Specifically, on Wednesday 11/1/2017 the Board of Directors of POEPPP visited the offices of OPAP SA, at the invitation of the company's management, where in the presence of the CEO Damian Cope, the members of POEPPP were informed of OPAP SA's decision to change the way calculation of the supply of toys played in our agencies, which will lead to a significant reduction, as well as its decision to terminate the existing agency contract and replace it with new ones.

Today, Thursday 12/1/2017, the Board of POEPPP meets at the offices of the Federation for a first assessment of the situation. In the following days, announcements of POEPPP will follow in detail.

ATTENTION: NO AGENT SHOULD SIGN ANY CONTRACT UNTIL A NEW ANNOUNCEMENT FROM POEPPP.

The Press and Public Relations Officer


PERAKIS MANOLIS
 
Answer: POEPPP opposes OPAP

PRESS RELEASE 16/1/2017

Colleagues,

Because OPAP SA requested a new meeting with POEPPP within the week in order to continue the dialogue and find a solution to the issues that have arisen and concern the industry, you will be informed in detail about the results of these meetings with a new press release-announcement for our further moves.

Colleagues,

Rest assured that POEPPP is doing its best to defend the interests of the industry.


The Press and Public Relations Officer


PERAKIS MANOLIS
 
Answer: POEPPP opposes OPAP

Joint announcement of nine unions of agents
17/1/2017

Colleagues,

As you already know, the new regulation of OPAP Agents has been published and the sending of a new agency contract is imminent, which will abolish the existing one.

Unfortunately, the data so far can only be described as positive in terms of our future.

In the last G.S. It was decided by the House of Representatives that every effort should be made to make changes to the text of the new regulation in order to maintain the existing convention, which assured us of important issues.

So far, we are dealing with the intransigence of OPAP and the coexistence of EEEP with the business plans of the Organization.

The purpose of this announcement is for the Associations to declare in all tones that they are in line with the efforts of the Federation and we are waiting for the results of the meetings with both the Company and the above mentioned independent gaming supervision authority.

We are ready to vigorously and in every possible way, whether it be trade union or judicial, our acquis and the future of our business.
In difficult times, dynamic decisions are required.

The Associations are the primary bodies of the industry and essentially its heart.

They will always be next to the demands of the Federation but they will always give their fights whenever needed.

Colleagues, all we ask of you is to remain calm and not to make hasty decisions and actions under any pressure that you will accept.
The information will be continuous and after the completion of the contacts and the negotiations it will be intensified in order to give you the final directions and the framework within which our claims will move.

THE ASSOCIATIONS OF THE PREFECTURES OF THESSALONIKI AND HALKIDIKI, DRAMA, KAVALA, PELLA, SERRES, IMATHIA, KILKIS, EVROS AND PIERIA.
 
Answer: POEPPP opposes OPAP

PRESS RELEASE 16/1/2017

Colleagues,

Because OPAP SA requested a new meeting with POEPPP within the week in order to continue the dialogue and find a solution to the issues that have arisen and concern the industry, you will be informed in detail about the results of these meetings with a new press release-announcement for our further moves.

Colleagues,

Rest assured that POEPPP is doing its best to defend the interests of the industry.


The Press and Public Relations Officer

PERAKIS MANOLIS
 
Answer: POEPPP opposes OPAP

UNION OF OPAP AGENTS SA
PREFECTURES OF THESSALONIKI & CHALKIDIKI

ΑΠ: 8 / 18.01.17

TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ΠΟΕΠΠΠ

Dear gentlemen,

As you already know, on Monday, January 23, 2017 at 12:00 in the "Vellideio Conference Center" OPAP invites the agents in order to inform them about its new business policy.

We would like you to inform us what actions the Federation will take regarding the above meeting, if for example,

β ?? ' The President Mr. Toptsidis will be present in Thessaloniki in order to attend the said meeting.

β ?? ' There is a possibility that he will arrive earlier or stay after the meeting in order to inform the Associations that will be in Thessaloniki about the positions of POEPPP.

β ?? ' An informative text will be drafted with the positions of POEPPP in order to be distributed to the agents before the start of the meeting.

β ?? ' There will be some form of protest of the agents (banners, etc.) outside Vellideio.

Our Union intends to assist in any way (availability of our offices for information, distribution of printed information material of the Federation, etc.) to the efforts of the Federation to inform its colleagues correctly and in a timely manner.

We are waiting for your information on the above or any other actions.

For the Union
Anastasia Tzabazli - President
Dimitrios Grammatikopoulos - Secretary







TO THE GAMES SUPERVISION AND CONTROL COMMITTEE

Notification
1. POEPPP
2. EPOTHX

17.01.2017

Dear gentlemen,

Attached to this is a Memorandum related to the "New Regulation of OPAP Agents SA" and the contracts between OPAP and agents.

Please, after reading the above memo carefully, answer the following:

1. Why should the already signed contracts between us agents and OPAP be replaced with new ones and not just be amended so that they are in line with the New Regulation and the principles of EEEP?

2. What is the benefit of your independent authority (EEEP) in terms of game control and supervision, from the abolition of the existing contract and the signing of a completely new contract?

Hoping for your prompt reply to my questions or to my personal mail: [email protected], or in the mail of "EPOTHX": [email protected].

Thanks in advance for your interest.

Sincerely,


Anastasia Tzabazli
OPAP agent




MEMORANDUM


By Anastasia Tzampazli, OPAP agent (code 229064), resident of Thessaloniki, 91 Oreokastrou Street, no. 56491, Stavroupoli.

TO

The independent administrative authority with the "COMMITTEE OF SUPERVISION AND CONTROL OF GAMES" - (EEEP) based in Athens (17 Acharnon) and legally represented.

Thessaloniki 17-1-2016

As it is known, it has been published in the Official Gazette Issue B no. 3923 / 7-12-2016 the decision no. 229/2 / 18-11-2016 of EEEP entitled "REGULATION OF OPAP AGENTS SA ».

Article 11 thereof, under the heading TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS, provides:

"11.1 The operator must adapt to the provisions of this decision within ninety (90) days from its publication in the Government Gazette.

11.2 Within a reasonable period of time from the publication of this decision and in any case within twenty-four (24) months, and provided that the provisions of paragraph 11.1 are met, the agents already operating agencies must be relocated to a place that meets the requirements of article 6 hereof, in accordance with the specific timetables and commercial policy of the operator. For this purpose and in order to comply with this provision, the operator will provide a relevant provision with the obligation to relocate the agent to the agency contract. In case of non-compliance of the agent, the operator will be obliged to terminate the agency contract after the lapse of twenty four (24) months, otherwise the relevant agency contract is terminated automatically and ceases to have any validity. 11.3 Until the termination of the existing contracts in any way, at the publication of this, the operator and the agent may exercise the rights deriving from the existing contracts.

11.4 Matters not provided for in this Regulation shall be governed by the agency agreement between the operator and the agent. "

From the above it becomes clear that there is a provision in the above decision b ???? New Regulation of OPAP Agents for the abolition of the termination of the "already existing contracts", ie the Individual Contracts from 28-9-2009 that each OPAP agent has signed with OPAP SA. and the text of which is common to all agents and has in fact come after consultations and a joint agreement between OPAP SA. and Agents.

It should not be overlooked the fact that the existing contracts have been in force for seven years, they have fully covered every emerging issue in the relations between OPAP and OPAP SA agents. and have produced legal rights and effects on both sides.

Nevertheless, it is clear from the text of the Regulation that the current OPAP agents will be invited to sign a new contract with OPAP SA. , with content unknown to them so far and which new contract will contain at least the provisions of the new regulation.

As it is understood, these new agreements will be accession agreements as their text and the agreements that will be contained in it will be defined exclusively by OPAP SA. and none of the OPAP agents of both the incumbent and the prospective agents will have any other option but to sign or not the new contracts.

However, the already existing from 28-9-2009 Individual Contract between OPAP SA. and Agents should be the basis for the new contracts after the necessary amendments in order for its text to contain the changes of the new Agents Regulation.

And this is self-evident as it has already operated successfully for a number of years and a legal status has already been established between OPAP and Agents which can not and should not be violently overthrown. On the contrary, the purpose is to harmonize the text of the existing Individual Contract with the spirit of the new Regulation.

Thus, briefly, indicatively and briefly in Article 1 under the title "Object of the Contract" the four types of agencies can be included, in Article 3 under the title "Agent Statements and Certificates" the agency manager can be added and in the text defined the conditions that must be met in the persons of both (agent and responsible agency) in order to have these qualities, in Article 4 under the title "Activity store" new distances can be added depending on the types of agencies and the area in which they operate, in Article 20 under the heading "Transfer or conversion of an agent company" may include the new data on the formation of legal entities and remain the fixed position of agents on the possibility of transfer of their agency and so on.

After all, in the already existing article in article 2 entitled "fundamental principles" there is already an explicit provision for the protection of Greek society from gambling addiction, the prevention of fraud, the suppression of crime and the money laundering, the protection of minors and the protection of the consumer, principles and concepts which are preserved by the independent administrative authority with the decisions it issues.

It follows from the above that there is no need to draft new contracts from the beginning, but it is enough to modify the existing one, which will include in its text the provisions of the New Regulation.

Finally, with regard to the new regulation, there are at least four points that need to be amended, which are as follows:

Article 1: To delete the words "as indicative of the commercial and financial terms of cooperation with the agents" from the definition of the commercial policy of OPAP SA, as the main object of the Regulation is not to refer to the commercial policy of OPAP SA but mainly in protecting the consumer public from gambling addiction. Especially for the supplies, the provision of the already existing contract is correct.

Article 5.2: To clarify with the adoption of a new directive of the EEEP the concept of co-location and internal connection of the agencies regarding the type A 'and C' agencies.

Article 5.3.4: Replace the paragraph as follows: "5.3.4. The above restrictions of paragraphs 5.3.2.1 to 5.3.2.5 and paragraph 5.3.3 do not apply to the agencies that operate at the time of publication and have a distance less than the above minimum from other agencies of the same type. The existing shorter distances from other agencies of the same type apply to these agencies, even in the case of the first since the publication of their current relocation, subject to the prior approval of their relocation by the operator ".

Article 11.2. Replace the paragraph as follows: "Within a period of twenty-four (24) months from the publication of this decision and provided that the provisions of paragraph 11.1 are met, agents already operating agencies must be relocated to a location that meets the requirements of Article 6. of this. In the event that the above period of time has elapsed without action, for the agents who will not be relocated, the provisions of paragraphs 9.3.17 and 9.3.18 will not apply ".

Finally, additionally according to par. 9.3.16 "the rights deriving from the agency contract b ?? ¦ are non-transferable", ie the transfers are abolished except those mentioned in the next par. 9.3.17 (spouse, descendants, etc.) and in fact in article 12 the validity of the Regulation starts from its publication in the Official Gazette on 7-12-2016. As previously stated in accordance with paragraph 11.3 "until the termination of the existing contracts in any way, the body and the agent may exercise the rights deriving from the existing contracts", ie as long as the existing contracts are not terminated or terminated to apply. Thus, the position of OPAP that from 7-12-2016 onwards, transfers are prohibited is contrary to the spirit and the letter of the new Regulation.

The above amendments to the New Regulation in combination with the amendment of the already existing contracts and not the signing of new ones with a text that will be "imposed" by OPAP SA. to the agent and will not be the result of negotiation between them, are deemed necessary in order for there to be a smooth transition from the current legal status to the new one that is being attempted to be formed with the issuance of the Agents Regulation.


GS RESOLUTION

A. REGULATION-CONTRACTS.

a) To intervene in the EEEP with a meeting and a memorandum for the change of unfavorable provisions in the Regulations of agents with a predetermined date, for the changes.

b) The changes that will be made, to be discussed in the Board. and consult the unions.

c) If the changes in the regulation are not considered satisfactory by the bodies of the branch, the POEPPP is authorized to take all legal actions to abolish the unfavorable regulations of the regulation.

d) NO AGENT SHOULD SIGN NEW CONTRACTS, unless it has been first informed by POEPPP with an announcement.

Efforts should be made to harmonize the contract with the regulation, where required, and to implement it by adding an annex to existing contracts.

NOTE: The above A was voted unanimously
 
  • Like
Reactions: SOS-BET
Answer: POEPPP opposes OPAP

Against OPAP - agents to reduce supplies

Its agents are moving in a trajectory of conflict with OPAP. The reason is the new individual contract that they are invited to sign within the next two months, but mainly the new reduced commissions that OPAP seeks to impose.

According to some trade unionists, the new agency contract is more unfavorable for the agents than the previous one signed in 2009 by the then state-owned OPAP.
The new contract is a result of the new operating regulations of OPAP agencies, which was recently presented by the Gaming Supervision and Control Committee (GSC).

The new regulation was published in the Official Gazette at the beginning of December 2016 and gives a margin of compliance, both for OPAP and its agents, for three months. In other words, the new contracts must be finalized by the beginning of March.

OPAP is currently in consultations with the agents' unions, in order to complete the final text of the contract.

There are two points of friction.

The first concerns the right of the two parties to co-decide on any changes made to the contract. In particular, the right of the agents to approve any attempted changes is revoked, whether they are imposed by the EEEP -as in this case- or by OPAP. The second and most important point of friction is the change of supplies.

For OPAP, it is time for the reductions of the commissions to the agents. The latter have not undergone any change in the percentage of their commissions, which remains at 8% of the turnover or about 24% of the gross income of the organization.

However, OPAP in 2013 was subject to a 30% tax on its gross income (Gross Gaming Revenues Tax, GGR Tax), which from 1/1/2016 increased to 35%. This tax will bring to the State for 2016 more than 400 million euros.

Now OPAP proposes a new way of calculating the commission of agents. This calculation is based on the net income of the organization. In particular, it is proposed that agents receive approximately 33% of its net revenue (Net Gaming Revenues, NGR). Net income is derived from bets, minus player winnings and minus income tax (GGR Tax).

In the end, the OPAP agents are proposed to receive a commission of approximately 7,2% of the turnover, ie the bets, instead of the 8% that is valid until today. Last year, the total commissions received by the agents amounted to about 313m euros. If the new proposed way of calculating commissions had been implemented, the agents' revenues would have been around 282 million euros.


source: DAILY
 
  • Like
Reactions: antony travelles
Answer: POEPPP opposes OPAP

23/1/2017
WHO


PRESS RELEASE

In the press release of POEPPP on 12-01-2017 we had informed the agents about the intention of OPAP SA to change the way of calculating our supply in all the games, as well as for its will for concluding new contracts which will include amendments to our existing contracts, which are not limited to matters for which there should be an adjustment to the provisions of the Agents Regulation. These positions of OPAP SA, which were announced to us in a relevant meeting we had on Wednesday 11-01-2017, find us vertically opposed. We are particularly opposed to reducing our supply in such a difficult economic time when many agencies are already facing sustainability problems.

These two decisions of OPAP SA were considered actions that could lead to a rupture in the relations between the two parties, mainly from the positions, which became transparent on the part of OPAP SA, as we had mentioned then. In the same bulletin we had written that we will refer in detail in our next announcement - soon - our announcement, something that did not happen, as the new meeting with OPAP SA emerged. with topics of discussion the claim of the organization for new contracts and a new way of calculating our supply. We considered that it was an attitude of responsibility and calm of POEPPP but also a sign of good will in view of the new meeting.

This new meeting took place on Thursday 19-01-2017 with the presence of the CEO Damian Cope while the entire Board of Directors was present from POEPPP. of the Federation. In this OPAP SA reaffirmed its intentions for the procurement and for the conclusion of new contracts, while from our side we emphasized our position-as recorded in the General Assembly of 12-12-2016-for harmonization of the 2009 contracts with the new Agents Regulation. At the same time, because we had been sent two days before the proposed draft contract by OPAP SA, we made reference to some of its points, which are extremely burdensome for the agents, but also a sample - in our opinion - of the intentions of OPAP SA For this reason, it was agreed to have a meeting of the legal advisers of the two sides.

On the issue of supplies, we stressed our firm position to keep supplies as they are, especially at this time and given the upcoming tax and insurance boom that will hit the industry, making thousands of agencies unsustainable. OPAP SA is very well aware of this, as we have also sent the relevant study data that prove it. We stressed to the CEO of OPAP SA that POEPPP could discuss a possible change in the way the calculation of the commission is only for Pame Stihima, so that the product becomes better and more competitive. We promised in the coming days to have a meeting with our proposal on this issue.


Colleagues,

Both in the matter of supplies and in that of contracts the positions of POEPPP are those that have been recorded in previous decisions of the Board, but also of the General Meetings. We are also discussing with OPAP SA, in order to avoid any unilateral actions and to find commonly accepted solutions. It goes without saying that we can not announce anything unless the discussions are completed.

In addition, any agreements and decisions that may arise will be approved by the General Assembly of Representatives.



The Press and Public Relations Officer

PERAKIS MANOLIS
 
Answer: POEPPP opposes OPAP

WHO




Athens, 30 January 2017


PRESS RELEASE


It was held on Thursday 26/1/2017, an extraordinary Board of Directors of POEPPP where they discussed the burning issues of the industry at this time, which is the decision of OPAP SA for a change in the way of calculating the supply of toys, as well as its requirement for signing of new individual contracts with the agents-with simultaneous abolition of that of 2009.


The convening of the Board of Directors was deemed necessary due to the invitation of OPAP SA to POEPPP for talks on Friday 27/1/2017 on the above issues. OPAP SA had sent to POEPPP its proposal, for the supplies which includes all the games and refers to a percentage on the NGR-which proposal- undertook to work out the committee set up by POEPPP and to inform the members of D. Σ. At the same time, in the context of this process, the same committee formulated a counter-proposal which was presented by the Board where it was discussed.


Also OPAP SA has sent the draft contract b ???? which intends to propose to the agents- in which a first elaboration has already been done by the POEPPP and its Legal service, the results of which were analyzed in the members of the Board with special reference to some important negative provisions, which some of these are abusive. From the discussion process, our position was determined and decided, in the meeting with OPAP SA the next day.


At the meeting the next day, OPAP SA raised the issue of changing the way of supply -with the use of NGR- as a necessary condition for the development of the company's business planning with the participation of the existing network. The opinion of POEPPP as it was presented to OPAP SA was, and is, that any agreement on the issue of supply is interrelated with the agreement and on the issue of the contract. Each side presented its views during the discussion, clarifications were given, while approaches and differences of positions were recorded. However, both sides agreed to have another meeting in the coming days, promising to make similar efforts to mitigate the differences.


The Board of POEPPP, once again assures the fellow agents that any agreement with OPAP SA will be brought to the attention of the General Assembly of representatives that will decide.


The Press and Public Relations Officer


PERAKIS MANOLIS
 

Predictions

  • 14:30
    COSMOTE SPORT 1 HD
    • Bristol City - Leicester
  • 17:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 2 HD
    • Wrexham - Mansfield
  • 17:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 3 HD
    • Norwich - Plymouth
  • 19:30
    COSMOTE SPORT 1 HD
    • Blackburn - Ipswich
  • 20:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 8 HD
    • Benfica - Saves
  • 21:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 7 HD
    • Al Etifaq - Al Ahly
  • 21:30
    Novasports Start
    • Burgos - Espanyol
  • 22:00
    Novasports 1HD
    • Cadiz - Granada
  • 22:00
    Novasports 2HD
    • Lille - Lance
  • 22:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 3 HD
    • Watford - Leeds
  • 22:30
    COSMOTE SPORT 8 HD
    • Estrella - Sporting Lisbon
  • 19:30
    COSMOTE SPORT 5 HD
    • Bursaspor - Tofas
  • 19:45
    Novasports 5HD
    • Fenerbahce - Alba Berlin
  • 19:45
    Novasports 6HD
    • Besiktas - Burg
  • 20:55
    COSMOTE SPORT 4 HD
    • NBA Action 2023-24 E3323
  • 21:30
    Novasports 3HD
    • London Lions - Paris
  • 21:30
    Novasports 4HD
    • Real Madrid - Red Star
  • 21:30
    Novasports Prime
    • Virtus Bologna - Panathinaikos AKTOR
  • Tomorrow 30-03-2024
  • 01:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 4 HD
    • Indiana Pacers - Los Angeles Lakers
  • 01:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 7 HD
    • NBA TV 2023-24
  • 01:05
    • NC State - Marquette
  • 01:35
    Novasports 5HD
    • Gonzaga - Purdue
  • 02:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 7 HD
    • San Antonio Spurs - New York Knicks
  • 04:30
    COSMOTE SPORT 7 HD
    • NBA TV 2023-24
  • 07:15
    COSMOTE SPORT 5 HD
    • WRC 2024
  • 08:30
    COSMOTE SPORT 5 HD
    • WRC 2024
  • 09:25
    COSMOTE SPORT 5 HD
    • WRC 2024
  • 16:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 9 HD
    • Premier Padel Tour 2024
  • 17:00
    ERT3
    • Panathinaikos - Milos
  • 18:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 9 HD
    • Premier Padel Tour 2024
  • 20:15
    ERT3
    • Olympiacos - PAOK
  • 21:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 6 HD
    • ATP Masters 1000 2024
  • Tomorrow 30-03-2024
  • 01:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 6 HD
    • ATP Masters 1000 2024
General Chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting right now.
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    Did you see replay?
  • Ertzan Ertzan:
    Yes
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    Fenerbahce wanted to postpone the April 7 derby with Galatasaray for the Turkish Super Cup at the mercy of...Olympiakos, but its specific request was not accepted by the country's football federation.
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    The Turkish Football Federation (TFF) informed both clubs that
    this has to do with there being no alternative date due to the teams' busy schedule.
  • Ertzan Ertzan:
    I was going to write it in the morning but it didn't come from the mobile phone. The non-religious, as was normal, said that they would not accept the postponement of the match. Our team applied for a postponement and from what I read, they said that the match should be held at the end of the championship, but the Federation, which has poured itself on it and still has to make the decision on the "penalties", did not accept it.
  • Ertzan Ertzan:
    Fenerbahce is the team that collected the most points in Europe but they don't see it that way that's okay but god is great
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    Does ANT1 show F1 on Sunday morning??
  • Ertzan Ertzan:
    I think only the plus will have it
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    oh shit...
  • Ertzan Ertzan:
    had an offer through PPC for 9 months free 1 month ago
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    yes I know....
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    and filming is shown by Ant1, the free channel at 17:00
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    England - Brazil 0-0 at 36......Over 0,5 in the first half
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    Performance
    the @31.0
  • M Forum Bot:
    User MrChow started a new topic called "Maurice Moss Tips" in the Football Predictions.
  • Ertzan Ertzan:
    PPC's offer for Antenna plus continues, I think, until April 14
  • Ertzan Ertzan:
    A few days before the Fenerbahce meeting, the meeting that Hugh Dallas had with the referees and the talks about the Galatasara-Antalyaspor match came to the fore, where the VAR referee admits that he made a mistake in the penalty that the Galatasaray player took, where in fact he said that the player "dive" in the small contact he had that was not for a penalty. Our President also spoke about this phase where he said what was happening and the Federation found him a liar, nice things
  • S Forum Bot:
    User std157489 started a new topic called "Student Research on Retailing" in the Cafe.
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    Only Javelas could get a red card without playing...the kid is really stupid...
  • Ertzan Ertzan:
    he had gambled on it :p
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    I'm really wondering... because in every match he's nervous because he doesn't cut the line and start fishing....
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    Fotis will nail it in a little while...
  • PANATHA PANATHA:
    These things don't happen...
  • Ertzan Forum Bot:
    User Ertzan started a new topic called "IFC Cup#15 Semi-Final (30-31/3/2024)" in the IFC Competition.
    Ertzan Forum Bot: User Ertzan started a new topic called "IFC Cup#15 Semi-Final (30-31/3)"...