PERFORMANCE-RESULTS-OPAP

[stxma]

Answer: PERCENTAGES-RESULTS-OPAP

Beyond that, kidding me if I understood you well, you want to see the maximum drawdown your system will have. In this case, you are definitely looking at trends that 200 bets can overcome with losses exceeding the 60-70% of the ban. I have done some simulations and I show you how your chart could look like:

When we have a total of 1000 and the flow of the SERIES OF GAME (2-0-5-1-3-0-0-7-1000-XNUMX-XNUMX-XNUMX ...), we can selectively focus on XNUMX or a set of them.

 

[anon]

Answer: PERCENTAGES-RESULTS-OPAP

One view is, apart from looking at a total of 1000 (2.30 returns), looking at them and voucher. We have this voucher 10 @ 2,30 each voucher to make a producer to see which - can be profitable attention.

2-30 ....... 3.20 ....... 2.30

10 ........... 0 ............. 0
9 ............. 1 ............. 0
9 ............. 0 ............. 1
8 ............. 2 ............. 0
8 ............. 0 ............. 2
and we continue to end.

When we have a total of 1000 and the flow of the SERIES OF GAME (2-0-5-1-3-0-0-7-1000-XNUMX-XNUMX-XNUMX ...), we can selectively focus on XNUMX or a set of them.

I have not understood what you mean by these 2 but at first sight they seem wrong as a way of approaching.

 

[tarantules]

Answer: PERCENTAGES-RESULTS-OPAP

I answer the original question:
From a sample of 7.786 games of OPAP from 20/10/17 - 24/08/18:

Ace of 2,30
Result 1: 116 Races (43,77%) X: 65 Races (24,53%) 2: 84 Races (31,7%) Total 265 Races

Ace of 2,35
Result 1: 82 Races (35,81%) X: 65 Races (28,38%) 2: 82 Races (35,81%) Total 229 Races

Ace of 2,40
Result 1: 81 Races (38,21%) X: 68 Races (32,08%) 2: 63 Races (29,72%) Total 212 Races

Double of 2,30
Result 1: 56 Races (30,94%) X: 53 Races (29,28%) 2: 72 Races (39,78%) Total 181 Races

Double of 2,35
Result 1: 56 Races (36,13%) X: 48 Races (30,97%) 2: 51 Races (32,90%) Total 155 Races

Double of 2,40
Result 1: 64 Races (32,65%) X: 56 Races (28,57%) 2: 76 Races (38,78%) Total 196 Races

And a personal advice and if you want to hear her:
If you think that with the above facts you can do something on the bet, you are very far-fetched.

 

[loxagos mark]

Answer: PERCENTAGES-RESULTS-OPAP

I answer the original question:
From a sample of 7.786 games of OPAP from 20/10/17 - 24/08/18:

Ace of 2,30
Result 1: 116 Races (43,77%) X: 65 Races (24,53%) 2: 84 Races (31,7%) Total 265 Races

Ace of 2,35
Result 1: 82 Races (35,81%) X: 65 Races (28,38%) 2: 82 Races (35,81%) Total 229 Races

Ace of 2,40
Result 1: 81 Races (38,21%) X: 68 Races (32,08%) 2: 63 Races (29,72%) Total 212 Races

Double of 2,30
Result 1: 56 Races (30,94%) X: 53 Races (29,28%) 2: 72 Races (39,78%) Total 181 Races

Double of 2,35
Result 1: 56 Races (36,13%) X: 48 Races (30,97%) 2: 51 Races (32,90%) Total 155 Races

Double of 2,40
Result 1: 64 Races (32,65%) X: 56 Races (28,57%) 2: 76 Races (38,78%) Total 196 Races

And a personal advice and if you want to hear her:
If you think that with the above facts you can do something on the bet, you are very far-fetched.

I copy paste ...In the data we see in the double or double 2.30 is absent, the results are about 33% against the theoretical 38%. it's a few matches near 100 it's easy to make this happen I want to see some stuff in their defeats and in their away games thank you again. If you have more games and you find time, you can have them.

 

[loxagos mark]

Answer: PERCENTAGES-RESULTS-OPAP

The post is on the first page of the subject. If you read carefully, you will understand my question.

 

[stxma]

Answer: PERCENTAGES-RESULTS-OPAP

I have not understood what you mean by these 2 but at first sight they seem wrong as a way of approaching.

I mean that a 1000 test sample with 39% verification is just a theoretical approach. Because you can play 1000 and be somewhat miserable and someone else can only play 390 with a variety of creatures and be a winner. Finally, if you want me to explain the better you tell me

One view is, apart from looking at a total of 1000 (2.30 returns), looking at them and voucher. We have this voucher 10 @ 2,30 each voucher to make a producer to see which - can be profitable attention.
2-30 ....... 3.20 ....... 2.30

10 ........... 0 ............. 0
9 ............. 1 ............. 0
9 ............. 0 ............. 1
8 ............. 2 ............. 0
8 ............. 0 ............. 2
and we continue to end.

Original message from stxma



When we have a total of 1000 and the flow of the SERIES CHARGING SAMPLE (2-0-5-1-3-0-0-7 ...) we can selectively focus on 1000 or a set of them

 

[loxagos mark]

Answer: PERCENTAGES-RESULTS-OPAP

To be honest I have not understood your thoughts

 

[loxagos mark]

Answer: PERCENTAGES-RESULTS-OPAP

If you can explain what you mean. To clarify that I do not care about the percentage of 2.30 in opap what I want to see is the probability of 38% without the rake. Simply put, the calculations in the ABSOLUTE SERIES OF GAMES for the largest bucket will be made with the percentage at 2.64.
In a small sample of 200 games that has been a friend here and I can not see it now I noticed a big bucket - 20 beetle with a zero rag.

 

[loxagos mark]

Answer: PERCENTAGES-RESULTS-OPAP

[h = 1]If I can place all these 2.30 bets on the SERIES from the lilis file (I did not find the time to deal but I will do it at some point) in all of these 2.30 games almost 20 a year now I think I will our findings were of great interest.
It can also help with a lot of interest I found in the two courts and I pray with its source.
5000 + Bets = 1,1 Max Drop Multiplication[/ h] [h = 1]3000 - 5000 bets = 1,25 Max Drop Multiplication[/ h] [h = 1]1000 - 3000 bets = 1,5 Max Drop Multiplication[/ h] [h = 1]500 - 1000 bets = 2 Max Drop Multiplication[/ h] [h = 1]This will give you an idea of ​​what kind of withdrawal you can expect in the future when using a system or tipster and also give you a number that you can put the total size of your bankroll.[/ h] [h = 1]Until next time,
Kenny Turnbull[/ h]

 

[Spyros21]

Answer: PERCENTAGES-RESULTS-OPAP

Just to express my opinion because I think it is a waste of time to look at OPAP odds. Of course, because it is not sharp (not by a long shot as the English say) so you can not say that the yield given by OPAP is close to efficient (with the logic given by the supply / demand for betting by the players- market and that the performance contains all available information about the game).


Also, OPAP, the model for parameterizing the returns it receives, has changed it more or less several times, so 2,30 10 years ago is not the same as 2,30 today (since it is based on a different calculation model). Also do not forget that another 2,30 in a single match, another in a 3rd that was old (for this part I would suggest you to split into games that were 2nd, 3rd, single) Still what 2,30 do you want, that of the opening or of closure or some intermediary? (since the odds change much more often now than 10 years ago). Logically (I do not know this) OPAP changes the odds based on the game that takes place "outside" and not in Greece.

I would suggest you do the same with Pinnacle returns to make conclusions (which is considered the most sharp book). You will be able to find them on a return site.

 

[loxagos mark]

Answer: PERCENTAGES-RESULTS-OPAP

Thanks for your answer. It does not matter much in my opinion 0.05 above 0.05 below or above it matters that the sign that is quarantine ok has 2% rake the opap has 15% you proceed to the removal of supplies and the numbers are about the same. The size of the bucket is either write -20 bets or -21 at some point in the passing of hundreds of matches does the same.