anyone who has made money in poker is simply irrelevant

[tullamore]

4 last days I have 14 on 72 earned preflop all in.

19.4%

I present to you what happened. 1 to 10.

My only winning →→ KK won 10 10


Since then


I apo A4
K8 apo Q9
A10 spathia xanoun apo 63 spathia

J10 exasa apo 99
AQ exasa apo AK
QQ exasa apo A7
KQ exasa apo A6
66 exasa apo AK
Q5 exasa apo J9



These poker players that you see on TV have taken the myths and rejoice are simply crows.
Not just crows. Overcourses.

In 4 days proven, I should be in the worst winning 60% of the cards I played.
Today I played like an animal and made a remix with 6aria or with Q5 or J10 to lose.

But the AK will not break me from AJ.
QQ do not break from Axminx
the AJ not to break from A4

Since every poker started to play poker, the sport became KINO.
It is not possible to make money on the rubbish and we are counting on the odds of not getting paid.
Oust!

 

[kosdpthess]

Answer: Anyone who has made money in poker is simply irrelevant

All of these celebrities are coming out of their coffers because they play with other vampires that, as you say, are likely to play, that is, with the so-called players, they get to play.

When you play with someone who can not appreciate the value of his sheet and make a call with anything obviously and the game is clear to the goblins.

Ego that deals with e-poker on platforms and so on, to ask you a functional problem. When playing with a real broom, someone mixes and shares the sheets with a predetermined series, beyond the likelihood of eg. a sheet on the flop and so on. In the leptosphere, this prefix exists or is like doing a schuffle in the same way before or after the list. I hope I made myself clear.

 

[djroof]

Answer: Anyone who has made money in poker is simply irrelevant

1 if you are talking about online poker you know it has HARDS TO GIANT DIFFERENCE from the live, NO relationship, online is NOT POKER !!!

2nd those of TV started from the bottom and some companies MUST make profiles for some to promote the "sport" so much of their money is from sponsorships, TV etc the rest is really profit since they play in almost all tournaments and when your life is poker where ... or you will win some tournament statistics and you will have a profit. Don't forget almost everyone lives in Las Vegas which means for breakfast they "eat" chips there ...

3rd play live and you will understand that he wants you to make YOUR "LOGIC" in the game and support it. Personally, in Loutraki, where I took a walk with friends, I am 4 wins in 5 times. Victory I mean I left with 250 euros + (250 is the buy in) once I lost I KNEW, I felt it from the moment I set foot in the casino (I get it in many gambling-related ones) I lost my shit the 250 since for over 2 hours I was on my money and while I was watching I did not go any further I had to leave, but at the table I had another friend and I said to play just for fan

 

[Silver]

Answer: Anyone who has made money in poker is simply irrelevant

1 if you are talking about online poker you know it has HARDS TO GIANT DIFFERENCE from the live, NO relationship, online is NOT POKER !!!

2nd those of TV started from the bottom and some companies MUST make profiles for some to promote the "sport" so much of their money is from sponsorships, TV etc the rest is really profit since they play in almost all tournaments and when your life is poker where ... or you will win some tournament statistics and you will have a profit. Don't forget almost everyone lives in Las Vegas which means for breakfast they "eat" chips there ...

3rd play live and you will understand that he wants you to make YOUR "LOGIC" in the game and support it. Personally, in Loutraki, where I took a walk with friends, I am 4 wins in 5 times. Victory I mean I left with 250 euros + (250 is the buy in) once I lost I KNEW, I felt it from the moment I set foot in the casino (I get it in many gambling-related ones) I lost my shit the 250 since for over 2 hours I was on my money and while I was watching I did not go further I had to leave, but at the table I had another friend and I said to play just for fan

 

[tullamore]

Answer: Anyone who has made money in poker is simply irrelevant

3rd play live and you will understand that he wants you to make YOUR "LOGIC" in the game and support it. Personally, in Loutraki, where I took a walk with friends, I am 4 wins in 5 times. Victory I mean I left with 250 euros + (250 is the buy in) once I lost I KNEW, I felt it from the moment I set foot in the casino (I get it in many gambling-related ones) I lost my shit the 250 because for over 2 hours I was in my money and while I watched I did not go over I had to leave but at the table I had another friend and I said I just play for fan

you are inexperienced from poker to casino obviously.

To talk to me about differences compared to the ONLINE.
The same garbage bats are playing in the casino and even in the casino because they are screaming inexperiences who have money for throwing and suddenly
watching 2 broadcasts in the tv decided they could be paid, you can win.
But I have a disadvantage because they have money and money (I speak for myself) I know 200 euro (it's in the regency) if I miss them, they will snatch me,
to have 2-3 stuff and I should only follow when I have absent outs. Otherwise playing conservatively (right) is most likely to take a small profit and to go.
But this will mean that 4-5 is bad beats. These for the ma.

For the tournaments now, things are a little better at talking, but tell me where to play and play? The casinos are made once in a quarter.


2 hours to be in your money is a minimum time, that's why I was infinite. Poker can be up to date, but 2 hours and fish right-left are a little bit short.

 

[tullamore]

Answer: Anyone who has made money in poker is simply irrelevant

All of these celebrities are coming out of their coffers because they play with other vampires that, as you say, are likely to play, that is, with the so-called players, they get to play.

When you play with someone who can not appreciate the value of his sheet and make a call with anything obviously and the game is clear to the goblins.

Ego that deals with e-poker on platforms and so on, to ask you a functional problem. When playing with a real broom, someone mixes and shares the sheets with a predetermined series, beyond the likelihood of eg. a sheet on the flop and so on. In the leptosphere, this prefix exists or is like doing a schuffle in the same way before or after the list. I hope I made myself clear.

That's what I'm saying.
The game became unpredictable by the stupid calls, because you can not place a player somewhere. I can not imagine that the other will follow an enormous rhyme to get a tanning dye, etc.
I have been scoring players online for so many years and 8 out of 10 write in the note "belated that plays everything".
Now for your question, it goes without saying that you can not know, even though the software is certified. There are other chicks but personally I did not have the money to "invest" in something like that, so I have no experience.
I'm talking about bots, etc.

 

[djroof]

Answer: Anyone who has made money in poker is simply irrelevant

you are inexperienced from poker to casino obviously.

yeah okay no live in Las Vegas but I can not say intimate to myself in a casino, you know me well.

To talk to me about differences compared to the ONLINE.

do you insist that he does not have ???? sorry then you do not have IDEA in general from gambling, casino, etc.

The same garbage bats are playing in the casino and even in the casino because they are screaming inexperiences who have money for throwing and suddenly

everywhere there are "inexperienced" players who have found money and are playing, even in the WSOP. But nothing to do with online.

watching 2 broadcasts in the tv decided they could be paid, you can win.

true, so fuckin what?

But I have a disadvantage because they have money and money (I speak for myself) I know 200 euro (it's in the regency) if I miss them, they will snatch me,
to have 2-3 stuff and I should only follow when I have absent outs. Otherwise playing conservatively (right) is most likely to take a small profit and to go.
But this will mean that 4-5 is bad beats. These for the ma.

THE BASIC RULE OF THE JOE which you probably have not gotten into a laugh and we are saying and inexperienced from a casino ... DO NOT PLAY MONEY YOU NEED !!! If you do that, YOU ARE DRAWING ON HETTA !!! We play only money we have for this purpose !!! I know 2-3 examples of psychology (as a test) to figure out what's a difference, but I'll write them another time. If you want, you can ask Darkside222 that Finland is left to tell you why Scandinavian poker players are better and your questions will be solved.

For the tournaments now, things are a little better at talking, but tell me where to play and play? The casinos are made once in a quarter.

In the Balkans. Also if you are a "player" as you say and not like other tournament hunters abroad. Poker is an expensive sport depending on how you look at it. If you have decided to dedicate yourself to it, you travel and chase everything. Otherwise cash at a casino or online table. With cash you can make a profit and since I have made the times I went it means that you can do it too, nothing is impossible.

2 hours to be in your money is a minimum time, that's why I was infinite. Poker can be up to date, but 2 hours and fish right-left are a little bit short.

They play a lot of role. My friend sat down and my incredible leaves came. I almost never had a sheet. I reached 50 Euros and reached 350 Euros but there around. I lost 3 aces hand-painted on the last paper who cares ... I knew since I was not in phase and the 250 Euros for that purpose and nothing else, so I did not mind everything because the previous 4 I was leaving winner, I expected the defeat. But this is a personal matter for psychology and I can not explain it. Fish can not tell someone you have not played with him to see how he plays. To see his movements, psychology, beating what he does, how he talks, what he drinks, etc., etc.

Parnitha, I have never played poker because I consider this casino to be the biggest "rot" in the world. Loutraki much better and in terms of feeling for me everything plays a role.

 

[tullamore]

Answer: Anyone who has made money in poker is simply irrelevant

Parnitha, I have never played poker because I consider this casino to be the biggest "rot" in the world. Loutraki much better and in terms of feeling for me everything plays a role.

I wrote that you are inexperienced in casino poker. 5 times you said you played poker in a casino.
What are you; 'Experienced;

I explained that the "differences" you say are included in the issue of luck and nothing more, but yes it shows that I am irrelevant to gambling.

Money and time to run in the Balkans for poker I do not have.
When I go to the casino, if 200 I make them 400 I will go away with the nerves, because I go to make them at least 700-800, so it's not my point to leave just a winner.
I'm not going to have fun, I'm going to get the money of the fish that they have for the fly.

Did I also ever write that I'm playing money that does not surplus me? That's why I have a long time to go to the casino because I'm not overwhelmed.

The Scandinavians are after the Australians the 2s the most lost athletic poker players. Research before 2 years ago. If I'm going to find myself in search I will find it. Not to use
arguments that do not stand.
I did not say that I am the best poker player. Neither am I a selfish person. I know when I'm facing a better player.
I want 1 / 3 times to be 50 / 50 or higher to earn them. I do not even want half, that's reasonable. 1 / 3 I want.

Also, the fish is seen at 5 minute when you sit opposite it. You are inexperienced

 

[djroof]

Answer: Anyone who has made money in poker is simply irrelevant

I wrote that you are inexperienced in casino poker. 5 times you said you played poker in a casino.
What are you; 'Experienced;

In live yes I have played 5 times casino and other 1000 in clubs, homes etc GREAT play and not with beans. I also play live from 1999 times that Paradise Poker was the UNIQUE INDEPENDENT platform and not today that Sportingbet took it and I was talking to someone from inside that did not know it. Here in Greece they have always found it (for 99%) after advertisements, TV, etc. So let's say I have some more experience.

I explained that the "differences" you say are included in the issue of luck and nothing more, but yes it shows that I am irrelevant to gambling.

You mean, like, saltines and their ilk, eh? If I tell you that I have to be in the game in general, you will say that I have it psychologically, but this is how I "make up" for a game. Personally, when I go to play for ME and ONLY and for MYSELF, it will count from the shoes, t-shirt that I will wear to what we will do and say on the way to the casino with the company from our house. For me they play many roles. What phase will I be in, what strike in general in gambling, etc. It is personal so I do not need to analyze it much because they are not interesting.

Money and time to run in the Balkans for poker I do not have.

Then you sit GREECE, you do not grumble and try to adapt yourself to HERE DATA!

When I go to the casino, if 200 I make them 400 I will go away with the nerves, because I go to make them at least 700-800, so it's not my point to leave just a winner.
I'm not going to have fun, I'm going to get the money of the fish that they have for the fly.

BASIC for me and for many is that you go for ENTERTAINMENT. When you go with this feeling, the profits will come from where you do not expect it. Also when you go for 700-800 euros of course and you will leave with less. If you were going to get 2-3.000 maybe the 700-800 Euro target was quite feasible. This plays a role, and with the amount you will get, you want to risk, etc., it is again personal rules of everyone. In soccer you will have noticed that they say in a match it is difficult to go for the victory etc, in fact they go for X but the goal will be something bigger to get even X. If you go for X then you will lose a lot group, countless examples even today. The fact that you go with an aggressive target to get the fish money is a mistake ... also you know in the TABLE WHERE YOU DO NOT FIND THE FISH ... MALON YOU WILL BE THE FISH FOR THE OTHER ... a basic rule and that.

Did I also ever write that I'm playing money that does not surplus me? That's why I have a long time to go to the casino because I'm not overwhelmed.

You showed that with the whining. Poker is not an ATM, you go and raise money, there are times when you will be a mat, there are times when you will spend "sacks" of money. Even professionals if you have read have gone through periods with great hassles. If you come in with 200 euros or even 5 euros more to get it IS A PROFIT IT IS A WIN. In 1 game what are you waiting to buy apple? It counts in the long run if you are a winner and not once. I repeat, we are playing for money that is for "throwing away" and not the installment for the tax office, if you are anxious that you can lose them, YOU WILL LOSE them, you can be sure.

The Scandinavians are after the Australians the 2s the most lost athletic poker players. Research before 2 years ago. If I'm going to find myself in search I will find it. Not to use
arguments that do not stand.

1st I told you to ask someone WHO LIVES IN THE PREFECTURE AREA and knows something more, since he also plays and knows them well. 2nd you talk again about online helloooooooooooooooo there is NO online only and basically GOOD players play live and not online where there are bots but also "super accounts" ... when they play, they play for advertising reasons of each company and why poker should stay high up. If you search for their stats with profits that you have seen and you have "gone crazy" that there are many you will see EVERYTHING IS FROM LIVE tournaments and not from online that you have stuck! As for the research it plays, find it to see where it is from, what it looked for, what players it was, if it was for poker only or gambling in general. Do not forget Australia is a whole continent and I told you about 2-3 countries, I did not compare you with the USA or Europe. Search the WSOP and you will find historically how many from Australia did something.

I did not say that I am the best poker player. Neither am I a selfish person. I know when I'm facing a better player.
I want 1 / 3 times to be 50 / 50 or higher to earn them. ( and I want to marry Tsapanidou, but I do not make a point) I do not even want the half, which is reasonable. 1 / 3 I want.

From TOELO until I CAN and success has a huge road ....

Also, the fish is seen at 5 minute when you sit opposite it. You are inexperienced.

I answered above ... IF YOU DO NOT FIND YOU ... Have you ever dreamed that you are the Finnish Fish?