Reading the topics that open with the players and betting disputes daily, I feel the need to open a topic for the proper use of the term Professional player.
I worry about sucking on both sides. Not all players are the same, nor are all bets the same.
And because not all players are the same, I prefer to avoid using the term "professional gambler" for non-betting practices associated with bots, hoops, arbing, bonus hunting, etc.
It is unfair for the real professional player to read, take time to study, to introduce players / teams / championships / cups, to appreciate, listen, to inspire, to risk or not to risk, to choose performance, to decide if it will sell etc in order to enjoy his win in the bet and not over the book.
Whoever has an enemy in the book belongs to another category. No serious book bothers such players. I point out the "serious". Serious for this type of player. Yes, I single out serious and weightless books for a professional player as I defined him.
Serious books will annoy, limit, block those who do not gamble but do something else. For these "players" serious are the companies that will allow them to make their "game" and those that will prevent them from being light. And so begins the vicious cycle.
Yes there are lightweight betting companies that want such "players" and allow them to play such a game for their own reasons. Win-win situation for this side.
So it makes sense that if there are such companies there will be such players. The market itself creates the customers they want.
Just to separate the sides and not name all the players in the same way. Not everyone is the same, and let's not forget that because of one share no one enjoys better privileges (better bonuses, better terms, better returns, easier identification, faster transactions, etc.).
Since all kinds of companies are in the same market, all kinds of players will coexist. Let everyone find what expresses him ... and accept the defeat with his head high as he accepts his victory over whomever he considers his opponent. In order to do this, he must first of all accept what kind of player he is.
I worry about sucking on both sides. Not all players are the same, nor are all bets the same.
And because not all players are the same, I prefer to avoid using the term "professional gambler" for non-betting practices associated with bots, hoops, arbing, bonus hunting, etc.
It is unfair for the real professional player to read, take time to study, to introduce players / teams / championships / cups, to appreciate, listen, to inspire, to risk or not to risk, to choose performance, to decide if it will sell etc in order to enjoy his win in the bet and not over the book.
Whoever has an enemy in the book belongs to another category. No serious book bothers such players. I point out the "serious". Serious for this type of player. Yes, I single out serious and weightless books for a professional player as I defined him.
Serious books will annoy, limit, block those who do not gamble but do something else. For these "players" serious are the companies that will allow them to make their "game" and those that will prevent them from being light. And so begins the vicious cycle.
Yes there are lightweight betting companies that want such "players" and allow them to play such a game for their own reasons. Win-win situation for this side.
So it makes sense that if there are such companies there will be such players. The market itself creates the customers they want.
Just to separate the sides and not name all the players in the same way. Not everyone is the same, and let's not forget that because of one share no one enjoys better privileges (better bonuses, better terms, better returns, easier identification, faster transactions, etc.).
Since all kinds of companies are in the same market, all kinds of players will coexist. Let everyone find what expresses him ... and accept the defeat with his head high as he accepts his victory over whomever he considers his opponent. In order to do this, he must first of all accept what kind of player he is.