Economical system for basketball

[Diokar]

We choose 7 games in the basketball without telling us who are starting and how much they will end up. In most companies when over is 1,90, the under will be 1,91 or above the counter. We complete the following 13 columns with the over and the same 13 with the under corresponding 1234567 numbers with the selections we chose. 1245-1267-1347-1356-2346-2357-4567-1237-1346-1567-3457-2356-2467
Although my variable development has good results, with 7 surely 13 Sure Successful, with 6 5-6 Sure Secure, 5 is definitely my money back. With 4 Successful About 37,5 Percent For 1 / 2 My Bet. Choose your choice of the amount you would like eg with the lowest value 2.60 you have a net profit 17. The system also adapts to the basketball in the basket it is enough to be 1.90 and back Good success in your every effort.

 

[stxma]

Though my variable development has good results, with 7 surely 13 surely 6 successful, with 5 6-5 Sure Secure, 4 is definitely my money back. With 37,5 Successful about 1 per cent for my 2 / XNUMX bet.

Which variable is it exactly like, for example, the amplifier?

 

[Diokar]

Which variable is it exactly like, for example, the amplifier?

View attachment 25897
[/ QUOTE

Which variable is it exactly like, for example, the amplifier?

View attachment 25897

Thank you very much for your question, stxma with regards to the system that you pasted and which looks like the base of the 4s with the 5 string on 7. Some pages give you a mean 1,60 performance. Follow it, but if you do your calculations , you will see that with such returns, no company will give you back your bet even when you find 5 competitions. The only way to enter with 75 and not with 50 100. with return guarantee is to request 7 competitions, only 2 results in 4adhes, 1,90 and re, Me this concept and only a few columns above, considered my system as an amplified variable with a little money and little risk. Your success.

 

[SERRES]

Sorry (but if I understood correctly) I have to fill in 26 13 bulletins withOVER and 13 with UNDER.

 

[Diokar]

Sorry (but if I understood correctly) I have to fill in 26 13 bulletins withOVER and 13 with UNDER.

Sorry (but if I understood correctly) I have to fill in 26 13 bulletins withOVER and 13 with UNDER.

SERRES folders you have complete is 13 the 4s for over and 13 for the under. It is understood that the easiest way is on the internet where it takes very little time for development. Your success.

 

[SERRES]

Thank you very much for the clarification.

 

[qazdas]

Wouldn't it be "easier" to combine over with under in the tickets?
If I understand correctly to take your bet back, 5 from the 7 games you choose will have the same result, either under or over, and to make a profit, 6 must either come under or 6 over.
What I want to say, and forgive me if I have misunderstood something, is that by choosing in the "blind" games, you need a sufficient dose of luck to achieve 5 or 6 or even 7 same results.
(With all good mood)

 

[Diokar]

Wouldn't it be "easier" to combine over with under in the tickets?
If I understand correctly to take your bet back, 5 from the 7 games you choose will have the same result, either under or over, and to make a profit, 6 must either come under or 6 over.
What I want to say, and forgive me if I have misunderstood something, is that by choosing in the "blind" games, you need a sufficient dose of luck to achieve 5 or 6 or even 7 same results.
(With all good mood)

Wouldn't it be "easier" to combine over with under in the tickets?
If I understand correctly to take your bet back, 5 from the 7 games you choose will have the same result, either under or over, and to make a profit, 6 must either come under or 6 over.
What I want to say, and forgive me if I have misunderstood something, is that by choosing in the "blind" games, you need a sufficient dose of luck to achieve 5 or 6 or even 7 same results.
(With all good mood)

If you want to play 7 4 first 5es that surely guarantee 6 a certain one or the one with 3. 7 surely 7 or with XNUMX sure XNUMX.

 

[Silver]

Good evening buddy ... I'll do a little math ...

I'm playing 7 fights ... Chances are ...

(1) Both 7 U and or 7 O ................................. 2 / 128
(2) 6 U or 6 C ........................................ .... 14 / 128
(3) 5 U or 5 O ........................................ .... 42 / 128
(4) 4 U or 4 C ........................................ .... 70 / 128

Say I play 128 times ... so I will pay 128 * 2,60 = 332,8 €
Normally (1) will come out 2 times ... so I will earn 2 times from 17 €, so 34 €
(2) will be 14 times, so I will earn 14 times from 6 1,31 = 7,86 110 € XNUMX €
(3) will come out 42 to get my money back, so 42 * 2,6 = 109,2 €
(4) will be 70 times when 37,5% of these will get my half stake back, ie 27 times I will get from 1,30 €, so 35,1 €

34 + 110 + 109,2 + 35,1 = 288,3 € returns

So I'm about 45 in my rake.

 

[Diokar]

Good evening buddy ... I'll do a little math ...

I'm playing 7 fights ... Chances are ...

(1) Both 7 U and or 7 O ................................. 2 / 128
(2) 6 U or 6 C ........................................ .... 14 / 128
(3) 5 U or 5 O ........................................ .... 42 / 128
(4) 4 U or 4 C ........................................ .... 70 / 128

Say I play 128 times ... so I will pay 128 * 2,60 = 332,8 €
Normally (1) will come out 2 times ... so I will earn 2 times from 17 €, so 34 €
(2) will be 14 times, so I will earn 14 times from 6 1,31 = 7,86 110 € XNUMX €
(3) will come out 42 to get my money back, so 42 * 2,6 = 109,2 €
(4) will be 70 times when 37,5% of these will get my half stake back, ie 27 times I will get from 1,30 €, so 35,1 €

34 + 110 + 109,2 + 35,1 = 288,3 € returns

So I'm about 45 in my rake.

Collect Silver Files, I have read carefully your analysis and thank you. If you have canceled your 14 test for my system and I will give you ALL of its results. 4 times X 13 = 67,6 ------ 2 timesX6 = 15.6 ----- 1 times X5 = 6,5 ------- 7 times lost -18,20. Total 36.4 value. From 19 / 5 and from the first time I wrote that this is a variable, so it seems that of these I gave you a good luck to you and you play.

 

[Silver]

Collect Silver Files, I have read carefully your analysis and thank you. If you have canceled your 14 test for my system and I will give you ALL of its results. 4 times X 13 = 67,6 ------ 2 timesX6 = 15.6 ----- 1 times X5 = 6,5 ------- 7 times lost -18,20. Total 36.4 value. From 19 / 5 and from the first time I wrote that this is a variable, so it seems that of these I gave you a good luck to you and you play.

I wish you were always so lucky! Good continuity in your work ...

Sent from Mi Note 3 using Tapatalk

 

[anon]

Collect Silver Files, I have read carefully your analysis and thank you. If you have canceled your 14 test for my system and I will give you ALL of its results. 4 times X 13 = 67,6 ------ 2 timesX6 = 15.6 ----- 1 times X5 = 6,5 ------- 7 times lost -18,20. Total 36.4 value. From 19 / 5 and from the first time I wrote that this is a variable, so it seems that of these I gave you a good luck to you and you play.

From the moment you play without being interested in what you bet, it is a matter of time for Silver to tell you what happens. It did not happen now, it may not be done in your next 100 bulletins but it will happen at some point and that is the only thing for sure. When you have 10 people and 9 chairs, as well as developing them, 1 will always stay upright. Such systems have been tested in the past and their outcome has always been the same. It makes no sense to try to discover the path with something mathematically proven to lead to failure. Or you will play bets worth having and you will win or you will spend endless hours for nothing and in the end the rake will eat your money.

If you play for your chivalry and you do not care about the profit then ok, you do well and you play as you play. But if you want to win in the long run then playing as you play it is pretty unlikely.

 

[Diokar]

From the moment you play without being interested in what you bet, it is a matter of time for Silver to tell you what happens. It did not happen now, it may not be done in your next 100 bulletins but it will happen at some point and that is the only thing for sure. When you have 10 people and 9 chairs, as well as developing them, 1 will always stay upright. Such systems have been tested in the past and their outcome has always been the same. It makes no sense to try to discover the path with something mathematically proven to lead to failure. Or you will play bets worth having and you will win or you will spend endless hours for nothing and in the end the rake will eat your money.

If you play for your chivalry and you do not care about the profit then ok, you do well and you play as you play. But if you want to win in the long run then playing as you play it is pretty unlikely.

Call me anon I spent a lot of time in order to understand your thought and I must confess that I was at a point of adversity. if I'm not mistaken. I am 61 of years and I have the advantage, thankfully for me, before I make any posting, to check 10 times. I wrote a variable in HELLENIC hoping to help maybe some, avoiding full development and by giving a 5 term improvement to 7. my goal is to offer their thoughts, always hoping for mutual understanding. As you see, I have avoided such statements as ...... 10 people in 9 chairs ...... cheats ... that they have been tested and failed ... I did not foresee any Alternatively someone can put those who want even 1 and NE in combination or with a hand in the basketball or with over or under. I wish every good results.

 

[anon]

It's not a matter of rivalry, not even staff, but that's the way things are. In their overwhelming majority, those who deal with such systems lose money in time for a simple reason. They focus on the wrong things. Instead of looking for the 1-2 games that will give you the advantage, you are going to fill out a 5 and 10 racing bulletin and how to make your alchemy so as to get as little as possible and get as much as possible more. Which is practically too contradictory because you want to reduce the risk and on the other to increase the profit. In this endeavor, all you do is put up with negative values, which multiplies when you get into the system, and in the end the money is raked by the rake with summary procedures.

 

[stxma]

4 times x 13 = 67,6
2 timesX6 = 15.6
1 times X5 = 6,5
7 Lost Lost -18,20
. Total value 36.4.

I do not understand the analysis you are getting clear!

1 times * 5 = 6,5
Do you mean that you got 5ary and gave you 2 4? If yes 6,5 is right?

 

[Diokar]

I do not understand the analysis you are getting clear!

1 times * 5 = 6,5
Do you mean that you got 5ary and gave you 2 4? If yes 6,5 is right?

Friend stxma correctly asked 1 times * 5 = 6,5 meaning 5 4s. 2 4es tell you that you have played, back.

 

[Larry]

The reasoning of both is correct, in my opinion. I do not think it is a "get 2 teams koutourou" system, but of logic I want a minimum of 13/7 to get something, always with prediction.
And it makes sense if you can not catch at least half + 1 in 1,90 performance, you can not win over the long run. Unless you adjust the bet.

 

[Diokar]

The reasoning of both is correct, in my opinion. I do not think it is a "get 2 teams koutourou" system, but of logic I want a minimum of 13/7 to get something, always with prediction.
And it makes sense if you can not catch at least half + 1 in 1,90 performance, you can not win over the long run. Unless you adjust the bet.
[/ QUOT

The reasoning of both is correct, in my opinion. I do not think it is a "get 2 teams koutourou" system, but of logic I want a minimum of 13/7 to get something, always with prediction.
And it makes sense if you can not catch at least half + 1 in 1,90 performance, you can not win over the long run. Unless you adjust the bet.

Conclusive Larry I did not talk anywhere about 13 competitions. I just spoke about 7. The 26 columns you see are for 7 racing. When I wrote that we do not care who they are, meaning you can lecture alone and 7 that you believe will pass through 6 or even 5. HOW TO FIND AND NEVER PROVIDE Anyone afraid of 1,90 not to hurry and wait for Sebbetri where most companies give 1,93 to 2 events. For example, for those who fear the ghost of the raccoon, it can be relatively easy for 2,60 to dive them up to 18 and let her sit wherever she is. What will happen in the long run nor do I know it or none of us here in the middle and sorry?

 

[Larry]

Conclusive Larry I did not talk anywhere about 13 competitions. I just spoke about 7. The 26 columns you see are for 7 racing. When I wrote that we do not care who they are, meaning you can lecture alone and 7 that you believe will pass through 6 or even 5. HOW TO FIND AND NEVER PROVIDE Anyone afraid of 1,90 not to hurry and wait for Sebbetri where most companies give 1,93 to 2 events. For example, for those who fear the ghost of the raccoon, it can be relatively easy for 2,60 to dive them up to 18 and let her sit wherever she is. What will happen in the long run nor do I know it or none of us here in the middle and sorry?

Friend 1000 sorry, misunderstood, I thought you had 13 matches and put 7 / 13 for sure 4.

As you say it is worse still. You will usually catch 4 and put you in. Moreover:

If I beat 4 / 7, why not play 4 * 1,9 = 7,60 and get 10% in the chapter every time?

 

[blizzard]

The player here has chosen both under and over from EVERY RACE ... he has put 7 overs into a system of his own and 7 instead of the same races in one and the same system.
So it has nothing to do with single ... if you play these 14 points singly, 7 always from 14 will win and you will always have 5% rake loss.


Here if 5 OVER come you will win, but 5 but come again you will win because you have 2 systems and one wins with 5a at 7
If you have your selections in the 1 system and the other, you will win if you catch 5 or if you get 2

Eg if one is a very bad player and loses constantly ... playing this system will see that he only caught 2 and will win by the opposite
Whether the matches are somewhat mixed, a rain in football or it's the day for the basketball because it's cold and nothing comes in, you'll take advantage of the advantages of the systems against the monk
(the singles have the advantage of finding better odds on different bosses)

I understood them well; it's summer .... original I have not seen a system that you know that half will win, but I would not try ...