Seven years ago we had the revelation of the Langard list.
Everyone then applauded the shocking revelation that would "send the hacks to their seats".
A lot of money didn't come out of this story, but that doesn't matter, it was some shady activities by some that came to light.
Other similar lists followed, such as the paradise papers.
Today we hear that all the banks of the world have lifted the secrecy.
He also came to Switzerland the day before yesterday.
But is this "for our good"?
Yes, it is for our good, the leftists will say.
The most cruel of them will also say ... "death at last to the petty bourgeoisie and the bourgeoisie".
I will not oppose them, especially those of them who have received the "anointing of appointment" and are thus assured.
After all, our ancient ancestors say "everyone is defensive about partying".
But the rest?
Let's look at the history of money around the world.
Since ancient times, there were coins, gold, silver, Constantinian flowers, Venetian needles, with which transactions were carried out.
Transactions from a distance did not exist.
So if the king of Persia wanted to pay the Pacilinak allies he had to go himself with chests and take out the pounds, hand them over to the local satraps.
But be aware that all this was, as it is today, state money. Venice cut the needles and circulated them to the people, not everyone made coins by themselves!
Around the 16th century, the banking system was created, and from the beginning of the 19th century, banknotes (banknotes) were also created.
Each banknote was exchangeable by the bank for an equivalent of gold, which is why they still write "payable on sight" on it.
At the beginning, each recipient of such a paper money went to a bank, gave it and took his gold, but slowly people trusted and so this ritual
was abandoned.
From the middle of the 19th century there was also a telegraph, so that some distance transactions were possible.
I could have my money in Greece and withdraw it in New York - given of course the consent of the Greek bank because there were capital controls.
Finally we reached e-shopping. E-shopping started around 1970 with credit cards. You would go to the train station and pay with the credit ticket, without taking cash out of your pocket. Finally, e-shopping has become very easy. Through the internet we buy whatever we want and we also transfer whatever amount of money we want.
What was the reaction to all this?
There was always some reaction.
The first teacher was Lycurgus in Sparta, with the coins-cement blocks.
In order for the Spartans to be brave and not be seduced by opulence, Lycurgus went about abolishing money and replacing it with elbows that each wanted a crane to lift.
They were followed many centuries later by Marx-Engels-Lenin and Stalin.
But they couldn't abolish money either - they had the ruble.
The father who was not joking of course had the gulag, Siberia, the holomodor, the Katyn forest and other means to get his hands on the money.
He did succeed, but at great cost.
It took an army - navy - secret services and everything to find each one of us and empty their pockets.
Until finally his system collapsed because there was no more production - Soviet citizens would walk into a butcher's shop and not even find a bobota.
But the amiable Joseph was never without admirers and without imitators.
Moreover, one does not need to declare himself a Stalinist in order to imitate Stalin.
So today everything came to be checked.
What's the result ;
The thieves are caught. Agreed.
But ... those who are not thieves and simply do not have to pay the taxes are also caught.
But those who are pure systemics - with a party card - are also caught if they are caught off-site somewhere!
Lycurgus would explode with jealousy.
Marx too, just like Joseph-Nikita-Leonid.
But it is not at all easy to ignore them.
Let's say we agree to remove remote trades while otherwise ignoring them (all black and our stratex deposits).
How?
With what legal tender?
What the ancients, the orthodox communists and even the Hitlerites could not do, is made very easy by modern technology:
The money becomes points that are counted by a chip.
It used to be that you used to go to the kiosk and buy a toothache (or toothache) depon for five euro cents. And this with a card!
So - the system will say, as follows: Those 1200 points where did you find them sir?
It's the pension you say. They look, see that it's the pension and tell you "oh dear, you're free".
But if it is not the pension?
I don't want to be bad.
Our Alexis Tsipras and Panos Kamenos do not want to tyrannize us, especially now that "the memorandum is over".
Any Syrian friend reading me should please take this statement of mine into consideration.
Also, our future prime minister, Kostas Mitsotakis, is the one who does not want to tyrannize us.
But I'm thinking 2023 and 2027 and 2031.
The law of math says that something towards dark khaki makes us appear by then (with or without red epaulet marks).
If it's 2031 until it's done, it'll be a surprise - I don't think there's any objection.
However, electronic science will continue to evolve and - among us Metaxas - why should the state be good? When was ;;;
So? Come on.
Everyone then applauded the shocking revelation that would "send the hacks to their seats".
A lot of money didn't come out of this story, but that doesn't matter, it was some shady activities by some that came to light.
Other similar lists followed, such as the paradise papers.
Today we hear that all the banks of the world have lifted the secrecy.
He also came to Switzerland the day before yesterday.
But is this "for our good"?
Yes, it is for our good, the leftists will say.
The most cruel of them will also say ... "death at last to the petty bourgeoisie and the bourgeoisie".
I will not oppose them, especially those of them who have received the "anointing of appointment" and are thus assured.
After all, our ancient ancestors say "everyone is defensive about partying".
But the rest?
Let's look at the history of money around the world.
Since ancient times, there were coins, gold, silver, Constantinian flowers, Venetian needles, with which transactions were carried out.
Transactions from a distance did not exist.
So if the king of Persia wanted to pay the Pacilinak allies he had to go himself with chests and take out the pounds, hand them over to the local satraps.
But be aware that all this was, as it is today, state money. Venice cut the needles and circulated them to the people, not everyone made coins by themselves!
Around the 16th century, the banking system was created, and from the beginning of the 19th century, banknotes (banknotes) were also created.
Each banknote was exchangeable by the bank for an equivalent of gold, which is why they still write "payable on sight" on it.
At the beginning, each recipient of such a paper money went to a bank, gave it and took his gold, but slowly people trusted and so this ritual
was abandoned.
From the middle of the 19th century there was also a telegraph, so that some distance transactions were possible.
I could have my money in Greece and withdraw it in New York - given of course the consent of the Greek bank because there were capital controls.
Finally we reached e-shopping. E-shopping started around 1970 with credit cards. You would go to the train station and pay with the credit ticket, without taking cash out of your pocket. Finally, e-shopping has become very easy. Through the internet we buy whatever we want and we also transfer whatever amount of money we want.
What was the reaction to all this?
There was always some reaction.
The first teacher was Lycurgus in Sparta, with the coins-cement blocks.
In order for the Spartans to be brave and not be seduced by opulence, Lycurgus went about abolishing money and replacing it with elbows that each wanted a crane to lift.
They were followed many centuries later by Marx-Engels-Lenin and Stalin.
But they couldn't abolish money either - they had the ruble.
The father who was not joking of course had the gulag, Siberia, the holomodor, the Katyn forest and other means to get his hands on the money.
He did succeed, but at great cost.
It took an army - navy - secret services and everything to find each one of us and empty their pockets.
Until finally his system collapsed because there was no more production - Soviet citizens would walk into a butcher's shop and not even find a bobota.
But the amiable Joseph was never without admirers and without imitators.
Moreover, one does not need to declare himself a Stalinist in order to imitate Stalin.
So today everything came to be checked.
What's the result ;
The thieves are caught. Agreed.
But ... those who are not thieves and simply do not have to pay the taxes are also caught.
But those who are pure systemics - with a party card - are also caught if they are caught off-site somewhere!
Lycurgus would explode with jealousy.
Marx too, just like Joseph-Nikita-Leonid.
But it is not at all easy to ignore them.
Let's say we agree to remove remote trades while otherwise ignoring them (all black and our stratex deposits).
How?
With what legal tender?
What the ancients, the orthodox communists and even the Hitlerites could not do, is made very easy by modern technology:
The money becomes points that are counted by a chip.
It used to be that you used to go to the kiosk and buy a toothache (or toothache) depon for five euro cents. And this with a card!
So - the system will say, as follows: Those 1200 points where did you find them sir?
It's the pension you say. They look, see that it's the pension and tell you "oh dear, you're free".
But if it is not the pension?
I don't want to be bad.
Our Alexis Tsipras and Panos Kamenos do not want to tyrannize us, especially now that "the memorandum is over".
Any Syrian friend reading me should please take this statement of mine into consideration.
Also, our future prime minister, Kostas Mitsotakis, is the one who does not want to tyrannize us.
But I'm thinking 2023 and 2027 and 2031.
The law of math says that something towards dark khaki makes us appear by then (with or without red epaulet marks).
If it's 2031 until it's done, it'll be a surprise - I don't think there's any objection.
However, electronic science will continue to evolve and - among us Metaxas - why should the state be good? When was ;;;
So? Come on.
Last edited:
