Regardless of the organization in chronological order in the previous months all the games that the 2.30 XNUMX performance has posted in the series. I do not have this archive and I ask the question if a friend has gathered them in this way or we can find something in the two-way network.good morning captain,
1) when you say latest 1000 games, do you mean? or the latest 1000 games that had 2,30 performance?
2) do you have such a record and are you looking for them? or are you looking for someone who has a record to tell you?
Unwashing your time, 2.3 simply means that over a period of time, about 39% of games will pass, assuming 10% rake. It is completely wrong to try to associate it with streaks or patterns because the games are independent of each other, meaning that what has been done so far has nothing to do with what will happen next. If you have 100 2.3 games on the Ace and 99 99 Aces and 100 Aces have passed 39 then the XNUMX game will again be XNUMX%.In the data we see in the double or double 2.30 is absent, the results are about 33% against the theoretical 38%. it's a bit of a match near 100, it's easy to make it happen to see some things in the defeats and in their winnings thanks again and again. If you have more games and you find time, you can have them.
Thank you very much for your comment and for what you say. If we go a little further, I will tell you this. The more sample you have at your disposal to study well the phenomena that happen in this way inversely reduce the chance of meeting something new that you have not seen it happen to happen.Unwashing your time, 2.3 simply means that over a period of time, about 39% of games will pass, assuming 10% rake. It is completely wrong to try to associate it with streaks or patterns because the games are independent of each other, meaning that what has been done so far has nothing to do with what will happen next. If you have 100 2.3 games on the Ace and 99 99 Aces and 100 Aces have passed 39 then the XNUMX game will again be XNUMX%.
I will see this thank you.The blog that says the previous friend has OPAP coupons in excel from the beginning of the game in April 2000 up to date.
This can be done by interrogation if you make the appropriate changes - save it as a text file first and then with a basic one to read it.
I have not understood what exactly you are looking for but if your problem is to protect yourself from big negative series then you do it with a simple calculation. You do not have to look into race records because you lose your time too and you are likely to end up with the wrong conclusions.Thank you very much for your comment and for what you say. If we go a little further, I will tell you this. The more sample you have at your disposal to study well the phenomena that happen in this way inversely reduce the chance of meeting something new that you have not seen it happen to happen.
So it is very possible to be in a position to cope with a strange situation when it happens during the course because you will simply take your measures ...
Tell me if you want the simple calculationI have not understood what exactly you are looking for but if your problem is to protect yourself from big negative series then you do it with a simple calculation. You do not have to look into race records because you lose your time too and you are likely to end up with the wrong conclusions.
Betting as we all know is a marathon and not a 100 sprint, so this calculation does not really benefit.It depends what you ask for. The games between each other are considered independent so in essence all you have to do is multiply the chances between them. For example, when you play 2.3 with 10% rake then 2.3 theoretically means 39% probability of passing the point and 61% break. If you want to see how likely it is to break 10 games then simply raise 0.61 to 10 and you will do this on 100. That is, 100 * (0.61 ^ 10) = 0.713%. If you want to see how likely it is to lose 5, then you are doing 100 * (0.61 ^ 5) = 8.45%.
So if you had a 1000 Euro casino and played 10 Euro per bet you will be called 862 and will be 1182. In general, you will move if your cashier is ultimately zero after 1000 beets. The maximum number of 7s you will have is 10 and the highest 43,5 bets. For this to happen you will need 2,3% success rate in XNUMX given to you by OPAPBetting as we all know is a marathon and not a 100 sprint, so this calculation does not really benefit.
You can count on a total of 1000 races with the percentage in 2.30 and the final result 0 (as if we were throwing a coin and if we had a result 500 / 500) the maximum negative fluctuation but the maximum positive;
With the variation term I mean the route from the starting point to the point that will stop in a number of wins and losers and correspondingly to the positive one.
So we have -14 and + 18 respectively covering the poppy rake with a result of about + 7% earnings on a middle rake of companies in the two-court. Incidentally, I find the results even for this + 7% which is very good. We were slightly overwhelmed because my question was to do with equal probabilities and not with rabbits, but OK is so. How did you find it?So if you had a 1000 Euro casino and played 10 Euro per bet you will be called 862 and will be 1182. In general, you will move if your cashier is ultimately zero after 1000 beets. The maximum number of 7s you will have is 10 and the highest 43,5 bets. For this to happen you will need 2,3% success rate in XNUMX given to you by OPAP