PERFORMANCE-RESULTS-OPAP

stxma

Well-Known Member
1 Oct 2008
1,088
315
83
Answer: PERFORMANCE-RESULTS-OPAP

Beyond that, kidding me if I understood you well, you want to see the maximum drawdown your system will have. In this case, you are definitely looking at trends that 200 bets can overcome with losses exceeding the 60-70% of the ban. I have done some simulations and I show you how your chart could look like:
When we have a total of 1000 and the flow of the SERIES OF GAME (2-0-5-1-3-0-0-7-1000-XNUMX-XNUMX-XNUMX ...), we can selectively focus on XNUMX or a set of them.
Last edited:

anon

Active Member
28 Nov 2017
92
153
33
Answer: PERFORMANCE-RESULTS-OPAP

One view is, apart from looking at a total of 1000 (2.30 returns), looking at them and voucher. We have this voucher 10 @ 2,30 each voucher to make a producer to see which - can be profitable attention.

2-30 ....... 3.20 ....... 2.30

10 ........... 0 ............. 0
9 ............. 1 ............. 0
9 ............. 0 ............. 1
8 ............. 2 ............. 0
8 ............. 0 ............. 2
and we continue to end.
When we have a total of 1000 and the flow of the SERIES OF GAME (2-0-5-1-3-0-0-7-1000-XNUMX-XNUMX-XNUMX ...), we can selectively focus on XNUMX or a set of them.
I have not understood what you mean by these 2 but at first sight they seem wrong as a way of approaching.

tarantules

Active Member
5 Sep 2008
201
90
28
Answer: PERFORMANCE-RESULTS-OPAP

I answer the original question:
From a 7.786 sample of OPAP matches from 20 / 10 / 17 - 24 / 08 / 18:

Ace of 2,30
Result 1: 116 Races (43,77%) X: 65 Races (24,53%) 2: 84 Races (31,7%) Total 265 Races

Ace of 2,35
Result 1: 82 Races (35,81%) X: 65 Races (28,38%) 2: 82 Races (35,81%) Total 229 Races

Ace of 2,40
Result 1: 81 Races (38,21%) X: 68 Races (32,08%) 2: 63 Races (29,72%) Total 212 Races

Double of 2,30
Result 1: 56 Races (30,94%) X: 53 Races (29,28%) 2: 72 Races (39,78%) Total 181 Races

Double of 2,35
Result 1: 56 Races (36,13%) X: 48 Races (30,97%) 2: 51 Races (32,90%) Total 155 Races

Double of 2,40
Result 1: 64 Races (32,65%) X: 56 Races (28,57%) 2: 76 Races (38,78%) Total 196 Races

And a personal advice and if you want to hear her:
If you think that with the above facts you can do something on the bet, you are very far-fetched.

loxagos mark

Well-Known Member
9 IOL 2013
593
523
93
lake of the penthouse
Answer: PERFORMANCE-RESULTS-OPAP

I answer the original question:
From a 7.786 sample of OPAP matches from 20 / 10 / 17 - 24 / 08 / 18:

Ace of 2,30
Result 1: 116 Races (43,77%) X: 65 Races (24,53%) 2: 84 Races (31,7%) Total 265 Races

Ace of 2,35
Result 1: 82 Races (35,81%) X: 65 Races (28,38%) 2: 82 Races (35,81%) Total 229 Races

Ace of 2,40
Result 1: 81 Races (38,21%) X: 68 Races (32,08%) 2: 63 Races (29,72%) Total 212 Races

Double of 2,30
Result 1: 56 Races (30,94%) X: 53 Races (29,28%) 2: 72 Races (39,78%) Total 181 Races

Double of 2,35
Result 1: 56 Races (36,13%) X: 48 Races (30,97%) 2: 51 Races (32,90%) Total 155 Races

Double of 2,40
Result 1: 64 Races (32,65%) X: 56 Races (28,57%) 2: 76 Races (38,78%) Total 196 Races

And a personal advice and if you want to hear her:
If you think that with the above facts you can do something on the bet, you are very far-fetched.
I copy paste ...In the data we see in the double or double 2.30 is absent, the results are about 33% against the theoretical 38%. it's a few matches near 100 it's easy to make this happen I want to see some stuff in their defeats and in their away games thank you again. If you have more games and you find time, you can have them.

stxma

Well-Known Member
1 Oct 2008
1,088
315
83
Answer: PERFORMANCE-RESULTS-OPAP

I have not understood what you mean by these 2 but at first sight they seem wrong as a way of approaching.
I mean that a 1000 test sample with 39% verification is just a theoretical approach. Because you can play 1000 and be somewhat miserable and someone else can only play 390 with a variety of creatures and be a winner. Finally, if you want me to explain the better you tell me
One view is, apart from looking at a total of 1000 (2.30 returns), looking at them and voucher. We have this voucher 10 @ 2,30 each voucher to make a producer to see which - can be profitable attention.
2-30 ....... 3.20 ....... 2.30

10 ........... 0 ............. 0
9 ............. 1 ............. 0
9 ............. 0 ............. 1
8 ............. 2 ............. 0
8 ............. 0 ............. 2
and we continue to end.




Original message from stxma



When we have a total of 1000 and the flow of the SERIES CHARGING SAMPLE (2-0-5-1-3-0-0-7 ...) we can selectively focus on 1000 or a set of them
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: loxagos mark

loxagos mark

Well-Known Member
9 IOL 2013
593
523
93
lake of the penthouse
Answer: PERFORMANCE-RESULTS-OPAP

If you can explain what you mean. Let me make it clear that I do not care about the 2.30 rate for this thing I want to see is the probability of 38% without the rake. Simply put, the calculations in the ABSOLUTE SERIES OF TOYS for the largest bucket will be made with the 2.64 rate.
In a small sample of 200 games that has been a friend here and I can not see it now I noticed a big bucket - 20 beetle with a zero rag.

loxagos mark

Well-Known Member
9 IOL 2013
593
523
93
lake of the penthouse
Answer: PERFORMANCE-RESULTS-OPAP

[h = 1]If I can place all these 2.30 bets on the SERIES from the lilis file (I did not find the time to deal but I will do it at some point) in all of these 2.30 games almost 20 a year now I think I will our findings were of great interest.
It can also help with a lot of interest I found in the two courts and I pray with its source.
5000 + Bets = 1,1 Max Drop Multiplication
[/ h] [h = 1]3000 - 5000 bets = 1,25 Max Drop Multiplication[/ h] [h = 1]1000 - 3000 bets = 1,5 Max Drop Multiplication[/ h] [h = 1]500 - 1000 bets = 2 Max Drop Multiplication[/ h] [h = 1]This will give you an idea of ​​what kind of withdrawal you can expect in the future when using a system or tipster and also give you a number that you can put the total size of your bankroll.[/ h] [h = 1]Until next time,
Kenny Turnbull
[/ h]

Spyros21

Active Member
24 Aug 2010
187
132
43
Answer: PERFORMANCE-RESULTS-OPAP

Just to express my opinion because I think it's a waste of time to look at OPAP returns. Of course, because they are not sharp (not as long as the English say), so you can not say that OPAP's performance is approaching the efficient (with the logic given by the offer / demand for the bet by the players- purchase and that performance contains all available game information).


Also, the OAPP the modeling of the returns that it has received has changed more or less several times, so 2,30 before 10 years is not the same as 2,30 today (as it is based on a different calculation model). Do not forget that another 2,30 in a single race, another in 3a that was old (for this leg I would suggest you split into games that were 2, 3, singles) Still what 2,30 you want, that of opening or closing or some intermediate? (as returns are changing more often now than before 10 years). Logically (I do not know that) OPAP changes the odds based on the game being "out" and not in Greece.

I would suggest you do the same with Pinnacle returns to make conclusions (which is considered the most sharp book). You will be able to find them on a return site.

loxagos mark

Well-Known Member
9 IOL 2013
593
523
93
lake of the penthouse
Answer: PERFORMANCE-RESULTS-OPAP

Thank you for your answer. It is not very important in my opinion 0.05 over 0.05, but the overwhelming significance is that the tag which is a carat has 2% ganita the crowd has 15% proceeds to remove the supplies and the summers are somehow the same. The size of the bucket or write -20 beer or -21 at some stage in the course of hundreds of races doing the same.

Predictions

  • 19:00
    Eurosport 1
    • SASAP Awards
  • 19:30
    COSMOTE SPORT 3 HD
    • Armine Bielefeld - Bochum
  • 21:45
    Novasports 2HD
    • Aston Villa - Leicester
  • 21:55
    Novasports 1HD
    • Monaco - St Etienne
  • 22:15
    COSMOTE SPORT 2 HD
    • FC Porto - Gilles Vicente
  • 19: 00: 00
    Novasports 2HD
    • Tofas - Badalona
  • 19: 00: 00
    ERT Sports HD
    • Dove - Bamberg
  • 21: 00: 00
    Novasports 3HD
    • Venice - Prometheus
  • 21: 00: 00
    Novasports 5HD
    • Partizan - Darusafaka
  • 22: 00: 00
    Novasports 4HD
    • Virtus Bologna - Trento
  • Tomorrow 29-01-2020
  • 01: 30: 00
    FOX Sports
    • St. John
  • 05: 00: 00
    COSMOTE SPORT 4 HD
    • Los Angeles Lakers - Los Angeles Clippers
  • 06:00
    Eurosport 1
    • Australian Open
  • 10:00
    Eurosport 1
    • Australian Open
  • 19:00
    COSMOTE SPORT 6 HD
    • Zaxa - Knuck Rousselare

Today's Birthday

Private conversations
Aid Users
    You have not joined a room.