Too soon?? Nah... Since odds are already out, it's not too early.
Best Film: Everything indicates that it will be a race for two films with two common traits that the academy loves: a beloved, award-winning director and a film that talks about cinema and Hollywood. I am of course talking about Steven Spielberg's Fabelmans (3,25) and Damien Sazel's Babylon (6.00). In points the first wins, as it is more optimistic and politically correct, while Spielberg has mentioned that it is semi-autobiographical and I think that will count. Babylon on the other hand has an excellent cast. A little further back in my opinion, but with backgrounds to develop into strong cards, are David Russell's Amsterdam (17,00) also with an excellent cast, and Martin McDonough's The banshees of Inisherin (11,00). Cannes awarded Triangle of Sadness (21.00), more and more will emerge along the way, a place in the 8th will certainly find two or more of the huge grossing hits, i.e. Top Gun Maverick (21.00), Everything Everywhere All at Once (9.00) and Black Panther 2 (67.00), but I think the duo will hardly be broken by any of the other two I mentioned.
First male role: Brendan Fraser (1,83) is the early favorite right now with his thrilling comeback as an obese estranged father in Aronofsky's The Whale. However, we have seen the project before with Mickey Rourke and The wrestler, where a good moment in Aronofsky's film did not erase a controversial career. Second favorite is Austin Butler (3,75) from the biography Elvis, but personally I don't think they will award a biography of a singer again so soon, two years after Rami Malek (especially when last year Taron Egerton's superior performance as Elton was not even nominated John). The favorites for best film will certainly be found here (eg Christian Bale (21.00) again for Amsterdam), while Hugh Jackman (9.00) looks to be in the top five for The son (film and performance in same style from the same director as The father and Anthony Hopkins), who say he is in the most mature moment of his career. Anyway, I'll go elsewhere: to Colin Farrell (9,00) for The banshees of Inisherin. A tremendously underrated actor, he has played everything with great success: from adventures to Lanthimos. This year, it's still showing up with great success in: sci-fi drama (After Yang), comic book adaptation (The Batman), true story drama (Thirteen lives), while there's also the snl element I've talked about before in other articles about Oscar. In the episode hosted by his co-star Brendan Gleeson (who is also a favorite in my opinion if he comes in this category and doesn't play the supporting cast), he ran through a couple of skits:
Lead Actress: Here Cate Blanchett (2,75) plays as frontrunner as she plays a real person, female pioneer in her field etc in Tar, so she has all the elements that twitter wants... eh sorry Academy , to get ahead of the race. The usual suspects Viola Davies (6,50), Olivia Colman (7,00), Frances McDormand (26,00) and Michelle Williams (8,00) are back with Woman King. Empire of light, Women talking and The Fabelmans respectively, while Ana de Armas (9,00) as Merlin in Blonde and Naomi Aki (13,00) as Whitney Houston in I just wanna dance with somebody are coming. The last two I believe have a ceiling on participation, as the films are not that great. Personally, I'd like to see either Michelle Yeoh (8,00) from Everything Everywhere All at Once or - first time naked at 62 - Emma Thompson (34,00) from Good Luck to you, Leo Grande. If I were to put money somewhere, however, this would be it to Margot Robbie (6,00) for Babylon. There are some old debts, but this season Robbie will be in three big movies that will logically play at the Oscars (Babylon, Amsterdam, Barbie), and she is in all of the reference points.
These for starters, we will be here to discuss them
Best Film: Everything indicates that it will be a race for two films with two common traits that the academy loves: a beloved, award-winning director and a film that talks about cinema and Hollywood. I am of course talking about Steven Spielberg's Fabelmans (3,25) and Damien Sazel's Babylon (6.00). In points the first wins, as it is more optimistic and politically correct, while Spielberg has mentioned that it is semi-autobiographical and I think that will count. Babylon on the other hand has an excellent cast. A little further back in my opinion, but with backgrounds to develop into strong cards, are David Russell's Amsterdam (17,00) also with an excellent cast, and Martin McDonough's The banshees of Inisherin (11,00). Cannes awarded Triangle of Sadness (21.00), more and more will emerge along the way, a place in the 8th will certainly find two or more of the huge grossing hits, i.e. Top Gun Maverick (21.00), Everything Everywhere All at Once (9.00) and Black Panther 2 (67.00), but I think the duo will hardly be broken by any of the other two I mentioned.
First male role: Brendan Fraser (1,83) is the early favorite right now with his thrilling comeback as an obese estranged father in Aronofsky's The Whale. However, we have seen the project before with Mickey Rourke and The wrestler, where a good moment in Aronofsky's film did not erase a controversial career. Second favorite is Austin Butler (3,75) from the biography Elvis, but personally I don't think they will award a biography of a singer again so soon, two years after Rami Malek (especially when last year Taron Egerton's superior performance as Elton was not even nominated John). The favorites for best film will certainly be found here (eg Christian Bale (21.00) again for Amsterdam), while Hugh Jackman (9.00) looks to be in the top five for The son (film and performance in same style from the same director as The father and Anthony Hopkins), who say he is in the most mature moment of his career. Anyway, I'll go elsewhere: to Colin Farrell (9,00) for The banshees of Inisherin. A tremendously underrated actor, he has played everything with great success: from adventures to Lanthimos. This year, it's still showing up with great success in: sci-fi drama (After Yang), comic book adaptation (The Batman), true story drama (Thirteen lives), while there's also the snl element I've talked about before in other articles about Oscar. In the episode hosted by his co-star Brendan Gleeson (who is also a favorite in my opinion if he comes in this category and doesn't play the supporting cast), he ran through a couple of skits:
Lead Actress: Here Cate Blanchett (2,75) plays as frontrunner as she plays a real person, female pioneer in her field etc in Tar, so she has all the elements that twitter wants... eh sorry Academy , to get ahead of the race. The usual suspects Viola Davies (6,50), Olivia Colman (7,00), Frances McDormand (26,00) and Michelle Williams (8,00) are back with Woman King. Empire of light, Women talking and The Fabelmans respectively, while Ana de Armas (9,00) as Merlin in Blonde and Naomi Aki (13,00) as Whitney Houston in I just wanna dance with somebody are coming. The last two I believe have a ceiling on participation, as the films are not that great. Personally, I'd like to see either Michelle Yeoh (8,00) from Everything Everywhere All at Once or - first time naked at 62 - Emma Thompson (34,00) from Good Luck to you, Leo Grande. If I were to put money somewhere, however, this would be it to Margot Robbie (6,00) for Babylon. There are some old debts, but this season Robbie will be in three big movies that will logically play at the Oscars (Babylon, Amsterdam, Barbie), and she is in all of the reference points.
These for starters, we will be here to discuss them