System "From 4 to 5"

[Fairplay]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

if he tries to play with money this thing will lose it all in a minimum of time. If he is afraid of the limit, I guarantee that if he limits it before he loses all his money, I will give him a new account. But where was he lost for 10 days? He would probably understand that it leads to damage.

No ganian, the child is just working tirelessly and has made some changes and is waiting for the results. In any case, he will inform you about the development. In his peace. But I will give him the money, and what was lost for 10 days does not help anything. Instead of giving help, we put obstacles in his way. My knowledge allows me, even if others helped, maybe something good would happen that would benefit all of us. So your above comment ???

 

[ganian]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

No ganian, the child is just working tirelessly and has made some changes and is waiting for the results. In any case, he will inform you about the development. In his peace. But I will give him the money, and what was lost for 10 days does not help anything. Instead of giving help, we put obstacles in his way. My knowledge allows me, even if others helped, maybe something good would happen that would benefit all of us. So your above comment ???

I will tell you why I said it. Did you realize that I criticize you more than Lyhnys? Because he has no relevant experience while you have (even if you say you have) 10 years of experience. And I'm not talking about the other tactic you follow, which will show in the course for you. 10 years even if you played all this, still not many vets after you play 10-15 a year. I'm talking about the 4 out of 5 system presented by Lyhnys. So in this number of vets that you played in 10 years with the other tactic, so many has played (posted) Lyhnys in a coupon. So in 2-3 weeks you can understand if it goes well or not. But here is a beacon light that it is not possible to make a profit, only loss and in fact fast loss and great. If you disagree and say that a profit can be made, explain to me that, when he has a profit of 1 euro from each match that the favorite wins and a loss of 1,5 euros from each match that the favorite does not win.

 

[ganian]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

and my critical tone, believe me, is for protection. I have helped many here and I would not mind doing it now if I saw that it has hopes of profit. I assure you that he has none. And I say that because you said that this system with the covers is something like arb. It is not arb when you cover with damage. Every Arab makes a profit, whether small or large. An arber with 500 euros would have a profit of about 5%, ie 25 euros. Lyhnus was making a profit of 100 euros with 500 euros. That is 20%. Well, that's just not possible.

 

[Fairplay]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

I will tell you why I said it. Did you realize that I criticize you more than Lyhnys? Because he has no relevant experience while you have (even if you say you have) 10 years of experience. And I'm not talking about the other tactic you follow, which will show in the course for you. 10 years even if you played all this, still not many vets after you play 10-15 a year. I'm talking about the 4 out of 5 system presented by Lyhnys. So in this number of vets that you played in 10 years with the other tactic, so many has played (posted) Lyhnys in a coupon. So in 2-3 weeks you can understand if it goes well or not. But here is a beacon light that it is not possible to make a profit, only loss and in fact fast loss and great. If you disagree and say that a profit can be made, explain to me that, when he has a profit of 1 euro from each match that the favorite wins and a loss of 1,5 euros from each match that the favorite does not win.

When he has safe conclusions he will give us the positive or the negative. I neither agree nor disagree somewhere with you, I just wait to see what will come out.

 

[Fairplay]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

and my critical tone, believe me, is for protection. I have helped many here and I would not mind doing it now if I saw that it has hopes of profit. I assure you that he has none. And I say that because you said that this system with the covers is something like arb. It is not arb when you cover with damage. Every Arab makes a profit, whether small or large. An arber with 500 euros would have a profit of about 5%, ie 25 euros. Lyhnus was making a profit of 100 euros with 500 euros. That is 20%. Well, that's just not possible.

I said that it is something like arb. I did not say that it is arb. I can not answer you whether it can give a profit or not. I told him something and he did a program so that he can study it better. That alone. the experimental yet.We did not discover anything.And for the fund in the blind I think I covered you.If you want something else here we are.And in the use of the computer I am not very strong.I think it seems.

 

[achilleas21]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

I said that it is something like arb. I did not say that it is arb. I can not answer you whether it can give a profit or not. I told him something and he did a program so that he can study it better. That alone. the experimental yet.We did not discover anything.And for the fund in the blind I think I covered you.If you want something else here we are.And in the use of the computer I am not very strong.I think it seems.

It is not something like arb. It is something like polish middle as I said but ACCORDING TO YOU. That is, you can say you make a loss at some stage but generally you will have a profit. In polish middle yes this can happen but in your case there is a certain loss as Ganyan explained

 

[Lyhnus]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

##Update##

It was observed in a sample of 13.803 matches that the 205 matches with odds sets of the following combination, all lost (dld did NOT win the favorite)

Φ - 3,80 - 3,20

Φ - 3,20 - 3,80

3,80 - 3,20 - Φ

3,20 - 3,80 - Φ

For some reason, these 205 games all turned out to be a reversal! This is good information that may give us ideas for a new program ..! We keep this in our file too!

(edit)
Because I want to catch those who ask about it "how could you find an X odds of 3,20 and a double odds of 3,80", I want to inform you of the command I used.

[B]ΑΝ [/B]στον εκάστοτε αγώνα ισχύει ότι (Χι=3,80 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Διπλό=3,20)
[B]Ή [/B](Χι=3,20 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Διπλό=3,80)
[B]Ή [/B](Άσσος=3,80 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Χι=3,20)
[B]Ή [/B](Άσσος=3,20 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Χι=3,80) 
[B]ΤΟΤΕ [/B]εμφάνισε στην αντίστοιχη θέση μνήμης Α(i)= [COLOR=#008000][B]TRUE[/B][/COLOR],
[B]ΑΛΛΙΩΣ [/B]εμφάνισε [COLOR=#b22222][B]FALSE[/B][/COLOR]
--------------
[B]ΑΝ[/B] στον εκάστοτε αγώνα ισχύει ότι [COLOR=#0000ff][B]ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑ=ΦΑΒΟΡΙ
[/B][/COLOR][B]ΤΟΤΕ [/B]εμφάνισε στην αντίστοιχη θέση μνήμης B(i)= [COLOR=#008000][B]TRUE[/B][/COLOR],
[B]ΑΛΛΙΩΣ [/B]εμφάνισε [COLOR=#b22222][B]FALSE[/B][/COLOR]
----------------
[B]ΓΙΑ ΚΑΘΕ[/B] αγώνα Γ(i) = A(i) x B(i)
----------------
[B]ΑΝ[/B] στον εκάστοτε αγώνα ισχύει ότι Γ(i) = [B][COLOR=#008000]TRUE[/COLOR]
ΤΟΤΕ [/B]count = count + 1

 

[achilleas21]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

What are the chances of losing all 205 selected matches in favorite odds?
2 ν 205 I put it roughly for the sake of example if we consider that Χ2 = 2.00 in all (where 2 = outsider). Which is definitely more than 2.00 but let ..
So to understand how many chances there is what the lamp says to be done..if you raise 2 to 205th, the computer does not even display the whole number
it turns out ... 5.14220174e + 61
In simple words it is even more difficult than roulette to bring the same color in a row 205 times
Lamp, you did something wrong again ..

 

[makaronas]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

[B]ΑΝ [/B]στον εκάστοτε αγώνα ισχύει ότι (Χι=3,80 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Διπλό=3,20)
[B]Ή [/B](Χι=3,20 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Διπλό=3,80)
[B]Ή [/B](Άσσος=3,80 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Χι=3,20)
[B]Ή [/B](Άσσος=3,20 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Χι=3,80) 
[B]ΤΟΤΕ [/B]εμφάνισε στην αντίστοιχη θέση μνήμης Α(i)= [COLOR=#008000][B]TRUE[/B][/COLOR],
[B]ΑΛΛΙΩΣ [/B]εμφάνισε [COLOR=#b22222][B]FALSE[/B][/COLOR]
--------------
[B]ΑΝ[/B] στον εκάστοτε αγώνα ισχύει ότι [COLOR=#0000ff][B]ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑ=ΦΑΒΟΡΙ
[/B][/COLOR][B]ΤΟΤΕ [/B]εμφάνισε στην αντίστοιχη θέση μνήμης B(i)= [COLOR=#008000][B]TRUE[/B][/COLOR],
[B]ΑΛΛΙΩΣ [/B]εμφάνισε [COLOR=#b22222][B]FALSE[/B][/COLOR]
----------------
[B]ΓΙΑ ΚΑΘΕ[/B] αγώνα Γ(i) = A(i) x B(i)
----------------
[B]ΑΝ[/B] στον εκάστοτε αγώνα ισχύει ότι Γ(i) = [B][COLOR=#008000]TRUE[/COLOR]
ΤΟΤΕ [/B]count = count + 1

If I follow correctly you write that with i = 13803 and with 205 TRUE in table A the count came out 0 (since B (i) is always FALSE when the favorite does not come out, and therefore C (i) is also FALSE). An optimization that will save you from useless work and will expose any logical errors is to make after the first IF a new table that will have 205 records for the performances you are examining.

eg to look something like this

 1       X         2             ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑ     ΦΑΒΟΡΙ
3.80   3,20       1,95               2           TRUE
1,90   3,80       3,20               Χ           FALSE
3.80   3,20       1,85               1           FALSE
...

All you have to do is measure the TRUE of the FAVORITE column.

 

[Lyhnus]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

If I follow correctly you write that with i = 13803 and with 205 TRUE in table A the count came out 0 (since B (i) is always FALSE when the favorite does not come out, and therefore C (i) is also FALSE). An optimization that will save you from useless work and will expose any logical errors is to make after the first IF a new table that will have 205 records for the performances you are examining.

eg to look something like this

 1       X         2             ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑ     ΦΑΒΟΡΙ
3.80   3,20       1,95               2           TRUE
1,90   3,80       3,20               Χ           FALSE
3.80   3,20       1,85               1           FALSE
...

All you have to do is measure the TRUE of the FAVORITE column.

Just as you say I have done it! I'm just trying to get information that the others do not need!

Simply multiplying reasonable prices makes it easier to get the results you need in the end! You look at the code again ...

True x True = True
True x False = False
False x False = False

 

[Lyhnus]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

What are the chances of losing all 205 selected matches in favorite odds?
2 ν 205 I put it roughly for the sake of example if we consider that Χ2 = 2.00 in all (where 2 = outsider). Which is definitely more than 2.00 but let ..
So to understand how many chances there is what the lamp says to be done..if you raise 2 to 205th, the computer does not even display the whole number
it turns out ... 5.14220174e + 61
In simple words it is even more difficult than roulette to bring the same color in a row 205 times
Lamp, you did something wrong again ..

Your logic Achilles really touches my logic! That's why I searched for them one by one, consuming them all Tuesday morning.

 

[Silver]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

##Update##

It was observed in a sample of 13.803 matches that the 205 matches with odds sets of the following combination, all lost (dld did NOT win the favorite)

Φ - 3,80 - 3,20

Φ - 3,20 - 3,80

3,80 - 3,20 - Φ

3,20 - 3,80 - Φ

For some reason, these 205 games all turned out to be a reversal! This is good information that may give us ideas for a new program ..! We keep this in our file too!

(edit)
Because I want to catch those who ask about it "how could you find an X odds of 3,20 and a double odds of 3,80", I want to inform you of the command I used.

[B]ΑΝ [/B]στον εκάστοτε αγώνα ισχύει ότι (Χι=3,80 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Διπλό=3,20)
[B]Ή [/B](Χι=3,20 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Διπλό=3,80)
[B]Ή [/B](Άσσος=3,80 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Χι=3,20)
[B]Ή [/B](Άσσος=3,20 [B]ΚΑΙ [/B]Χι=3,80) 
[B]ΤΟΤΕ [/B]εμφάνισε στην αντίστοιχη θέση μνήμης Α(i)= [COLOR=#008000][B]TRUE[/B][/COLOR],
[B]ΑΛΛΙΩΣ [/B]εμφάνισε [COLOR=#b22222][B]FALSE[/B][/COLOR]
--------------
[B]ΑΝ[/B] στον εκάστοτε αγώνα ισχύει ότι [COLOR=#0000ff][B]ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑ=ΦΑΒΟΡΙ
[/B][/COLOR][B]ΤΟΤΕ [/B]εμφάνισε στην αντίστοιχη θέση μνήμης B(i)= [COLOR=#008000][B]TRUE[/B][/COLOR],
[B]ΑΛΛΙΩΣ [/B]εμφάνισε [COLOR=#b22222][B]FALSE[/B][/COLOR]
----------------
[B]ΓΙΑ ΚΑΘΕ[/B] αγώνα Γ(i) = A(i) x B(i)
----------------
[B]ΑΝ[/B] στον εκάστοτε αγώνα ισχύει ότι Γ(i) = [B][COLOR=#008000]TRUE[/COLOR]
ΤΟΤΕ [/B]count = count + 1

11/03/2007 Atletico Madrid - La Coruna 1,90-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 2-0
09/05/2007 Lyon - Lance 1,75-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 3-0
16/09/2007 Santander - Levante 1,70-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 1-0
30/09/2007 Udinese - Parma 1,70-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 2-1
06/10/2007 Thelta - Jereth 1.70-3.20-3.80 FINAL RESULT 3-1
01/01 / 08Bristol - Coventry 1,70-3,20-3,80 T.A. 2-1
15/04/2009 Caracas - Everton De Vina 1,70-3,20-3,80 T.A. 1-0
... (THEN I WAS BORED AND PASSED MATCHES)
16/02/2011 Inter - Roma 1,75-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 5-3
12/09/2015 Sigma Olobic - Zihlava 1,75-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 2-1
24-01-2016 Temuco - Everton De Vina 1,75-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 4-1
06/03/2016 Deportivo Eldens - Espanyol B. 1,72-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 2-1

And I only looked for the yield Φ - 3,20 - 3,80

 

[Lyhnus]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

11/03/2007 Atletico Madrid - La Coruna 1,90-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 2-0
09/05/2007 Lyon - Lance 1,75-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 3-0
16/09/2007 Santander - Levante 1,70-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 1-0
30/09/2007 Udinese - Parma 1,70-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 2-1
06/10/2007 Thelta - Jereth 1.70-3.20-3.80 FINAL RESULT 3-1
01/01 / 08Bristol - Coventry 1,70-3,20-3,80 T.A. 2-1
15/04/2009 Caracas - Everton De Vina 1,70-3,20-3,80 T.A. 1-0
... (THEN I WAS BORED AND PASSED MATCHES)
16/02/2011 Inter - Roma 1,75-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 5-3
12/09/2015 Sigma Olobic - Zihlava 1,75-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 2-1
24-01-2016 Temuco - Everton De Vina 1,75-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 4-1
06/03/2016 Deportivo Eldens - Espanyol B. 1,72-3,20-3,80 FINAL RESULT 2-1

And I only looked for the yield Φ - 3,20 - 3,80

No I did not go so far ... you make me review now! Thank you .. That's why I uploaded it so that we can look for it in the context of the factual!

(edit)
Again if you think about it, if the matches you sent me have to appear once a month, the information I gave you may not be 100% successful but in months it is profitable if we think differently about managing this information!
What do you think?

 

[Silver]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

No I did not go so far ... you make me review now! Thank you .. That's why I uploaded it so that we can look for it in the context of the factual!

(edit)
Again if you think about it, if the matches you sent me have to appear once a month, the information I gave you may not be 100% successful but in months it is profitable if we think differently about managing this information!
What do you think?

I did not put all the matches ...

With a rough statistical analysis I did about 60% were aces in this set of odds.

 

[Lyhnus]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

F *** !!!

And if you think about the rake ... Damn! Let's go back to the notebook again ...

 

[achilleas21]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

Your logic Achilles really touches my logic! That's why I searched for them one by one, consuming them all Tuesday morning.

It's a simple logic. Losing 205 games is the same chance as catching them if the odds on F-out were the same. In your case it was even harder to lose them all than to catch them all since the favorites have lower odds

 

[Lyhnus]

Answer: "From 4 to 5" system

Terminate system experiment "From 4 to 5"

This month (September) presents an incredible curve with a dip down! For the whole of August if I had played all the games I have chosen for the system I made, I would have net profit, approximately + 1.700 €. September that is not over yet, has already created an incredible hassle for me, which so far has net loss, approximately -1.200 €. Because I am a person who does not like to take risks and there is no way I can give money to something that can bring me an infinitesimal profit, with so much effort, eh no !!

Let's go for more my friends !!