Answer: 15-17 / 12
My own logic in general for .................. (propo ............... propogole ...... bet) and manner
playing in terms of column length .... (14th ............... 8th ............... and X? nyada)
has to do with having the right tools-programs.
From what I have seen at least such tools programs do not exist ... or if they do exist
IS FOR INDIVIDUAL USE ONLY.
The strange thing is that if you collect all the Greek constructions for example in Propos
and you put them in the (mixer) they come out I can say a remarkable result so that they give
the motivation to build systems. But as units I consider them worthwhile
as a point I would say 60-70%.
But beyond my own point of view I do not fail to say (THAT AT THIS POINT THEY HAVE
UTILIZATION OF THEIR PROGRAMS HAVE GIVEN A GOOD WORK) and we thank them
all who have given and some free.
But they still have a COMMERCIAL CHARACTER and I do not mean that I want a Free program
but I would prefer to have both 100 euros and 700-1000 euros or more, I personally
I would have an example of 1000 euros if the program did what I ask and again to pay 100 -200 euros
if in the process I wanted to add some parameters according to my own needs.
Still existing programs if added or modified some parameters would be done
Awesome tools.
Now about how I want to play.
Something that would be useful to be Automated but I do it by hand
and it takes me hours to do statistics
in how the terms I want to put are combined so that when
combine to have the verification I request.
I would give you some examples but I burned a record and 3-4 programs that I had go
and I only have some demos that do not bring out the statistics in detail as I want.
I will give a simple example in Propo
Number of points 1-X-2
1 => 4-5-6-7-8-9 ...................... VERIFICATION .... 77 ........ .. ON ........ 80 ............... 96% (alone)
X => 1-2-3-4-5 ......................... VERIFICATION .... 75 ....... ... AT ........ 80 ............... 93% (alone)
.
2 => 1-2-3-4-5 ......................... VERIFICATION .... 70 ....... ... AT ........ 80 ................ 87% (alone)
Here he does not do a total verification for me but he has to play at about 80% of the total.
Based on the above I start and process for example 100-500-1000 ... !! terms or patents that
not to miss the total 80% but it takes a lot of work and patience and programs that
to do what you think.
After exhausting my potential I will reach a level.
If it takes me for any standard the double welcome.
End of odds with probabilities that I will aim for at least 80% verification in total
I will look at how much money I have for the system and I will put accordingly
A) Step-by-step-Exhausts-And processing area.
For the propogol now I would do the same with the above
the most basic of all numbers 30 and a combination of terms with verification
which I will define that is enough for me.
My own logic in general for .................. (propo ............... propogole ...... bet) and manner
playing in terms of column length .... (14th ............... 8th ............... and X? nyada)
has to do with having the right tools-programs.
From what I have seen at least such tools programs do not exist ... or if they do exist
IS FOR INDIVIDUAL USE ONLY.
The strange thing is that if you collect all the Greek constructions for example in Propos
and you put them in the (mixer) they come out I can say a remarkable result so that they give
the motivation to build systems. But as units I consider them worthwhile
as a point I would say 60-70%.
But beyond my own point of view I do not fail to say (THAT AT THIS POINT THEY HAVE
UTILIZATION OF THEIR PROGRAMS HAVE GIVEN A GOOD WORK) and we thank them
all who have given and some free.
But they still have a COMMERCIAL CHARACTER and I do not mean that I want a Free program
but I would prefer to have both 100 euros and 700-1000 euros or more, I personally
I would have an example of 1000 euros if the program did what I ask and again to pay 100 -200 euros
if in the process I wanted to add some parameters according to my own needs.
Still existing programs if added or modified some parameters would be done
Awesome tools.
Now about how I want to play.
Something that would be useful to be Automated but I do it by hand
and it takes me hours to do statistics
in how the terms I want to put are combined so that when
combine to have the verification I request.
I would give you some examples but I burned a record and 3-4 programs that I had go
and I only have some demos that do not bring out the statistics in detail as I want.
I will give a simple example in Propo
Number of points 1-X-2
1 => 4-5-6-7-8-9 ...................... VERIFICATION .... 77 ........ .. ON ........ 80 ............... 96% (alone)
X => 1-2-3-4-5 ......................... VERIFICATION .... 75 ....... ... AT ........ 80 ............... 93% (alone)
.
2 => 1-2-3-4-5 ......................... VERIFICATION .... 70 ....... ... AT ........ 80 ................ 87% (alone)
Here he does not do a total verification for me but he has to play at about 80% of the total.
Based on the above I start and process for example 100-500-1000 ... !! terms or patents that
not to miss the total 80% but it takes a lot of work and patience and programs that
to do what you think.
After exhausting my potential I will reach a level.
If it takes me for any standard the double welcome.
End of odds with probabilities that I will aim for at least 80% verification in total
I will look at how much money I have for the system and I will put accordingly
A) Step-by-step-Exhausts-And processing area.
For the propogol now I would do the same with the above
the most basic of all numbers 30 and a combination of terms with verification
which I will define that is enough for me.
Last edited: