I start with a must bet ... I bet a lot because the value is huge although the risk is great.
Djokovic: Winner without losing set (50) Stoiximan (3/10)
RF: Winner without losing set (100) Stoiximan (2/10)
1) Anyone who has seen what ATP Finals is understands why. All players want to win 2-0 sets to increase their chances of qualifying.
2) The No. 1 is at stake, so Novak will go to scan every match.
3) RF with appearances in Basel is capable of everything.
4) One has 6 wins the other 5.
5) RF has come very close to achieving this without losing a set, but unfortunately lost a TV. Novak went to do it last year, but in the final he appeared lower than expected and lost to Zverev.
6) However, the bet appeared by Hewitt even 20 years ago, and so value theoretically exists for another 30 years.
7) I will not play with the players of the other group because they are either beginners, or without good performances in the specific tournament ..
Djokovic: Winner without losing set (50) Stoiximan (3/10)
RF: Winner without losing set (100) Stoiximan (2/10)
1) Anyone who has seen what ATP Finals is understands why. All players want to win 2-0 sets to increase their chances of qualifying.
2) The No. 1 is at stake, so Novak will go to scan every match.
3) RF with appearances in Basel is capable of everything.
4) One has 6 wins the other 5.
5) RF has come very close to achieving this without losing a set, but unfortunately lost a TV. Novak went to do it last year, but in the final he appeared lower than expected and lost to Zverev.
6) However, the bet appeared by Hewitt even 20 years ago, and so value theoretically exists for another 30 years.
7) I will not play with the players of the other group because they are either beginners, or without good performances in the specific tournament ..