Answer: Early bets
You're wrong about the covers. First, playing cover can also be worthwhile in coverage where performance moves beyond the correct values before the correction comes (and if it comes). This is often the case in Latin American matches when some specific tipsters pick picks. Now you're going to tell me, sit down to me to know now exactly what Wilstermann's right performances are from the exotic Cochabamba to do the best performance. Here we do not even know what color jersey wear. In such cases that you can not or do not want to calculate the exact odds then you cover before the start of the race because anyway we calculate the value theoretically based on the closing odds of Pinnacle and the other Asians.
When you make coverage on the centerline then it will probably give you the same profit in the long run compared to whether you leave it uncovered. Take the Bolivar fight. You play the OVER at 1.97 and close at 1.52 on Pinnacle. Let's say Pinnacle's odds are right. Pinnacle 1.52 gives you 61,5% probability so 1.97 has 21% value. If you do cover under 3.5 which is not the 2.5 core line with bet365 then you have 18% profit on your original bet. In essence, for every 100 euro, you earn 3 less if you make coverage than letting it run uncovered. However, if you do cover under 4 by playing 2.07 of Bet365 then you get a positive middle 1.83% on the initial bet. In games with a central line full number (2, 3, 4 and coke) goals the probability of sitting exactly at this number is somewhere 23-25%. So you have 23% coming out of the middle (just going 4 goal) giving you 97% gain and 77% to get 1,83%. This in the long run is 23.7% profit. In fact, by doing the cover you get more than to leave it uncovered. And not only that, but you also have zero risk.
Apart from that, the most important and basic advantage of the coverage is that due to the zero risk you have the opportunity to load games for maximum profit. As long as you do not lose due to coverage, there is no reason to be afraid to bet. You do not even care what happens to the result. You will definitely have the money in your pocket even before the race starts. The Kimarones you gave for example were not for 3, 4 or 5 stakes. You hit him in the head with an all in that says the reason why it was an obvious mistake. That is, if for example you intended to play 100 euros uncovered, why not put 300 with cash out? This had a value of around 35% based on the closing of the Asians. With 2.38 that the ace closed in the bet, 35% would give you the cash out. If not 35, logically a 30 ari would give it. But even if it were 25, it is better to play 300 with cashout at 375 than 100 uncovered to go for 35. The amounts are theoretical but the meaning does not change. In addition to the odds, you also need turnover to make a profit.
You do well and you stakes because you can not tell him the other go play that point and load it. Nor is it keeping a cashier as a tipter with loads and covers.
