The majority overrides one or two who will perform well ... Doesn't this make us have a majority statistic?
I'll tell you something typical. A player for 2 or 3 months played every SK Olympics at 1,20, Paok at 1,40 and Chelsea for example at 1,35 There I was as an option. The B player had Olympic at 1,20 Paok at 1,40 Real at 1,25. And this resulted in the following:
Olympiacos 17 times as an option
Packed 15 times as an option
Chelsea 11 times as an option
The a and b players then leave and after a while the following phenomenon occurs:
Barcelona 6 times
Man City 6 times
6 times
Olympic 5 times
Chelsea 5 times
Juventus 5 times
Check 4 times
Bayern 4 times
Inter 4 times
Will you tell me about two players? But if these two players choose Barcelona for Olympiacos and Juventus it automatically changes the whole project, because Barcelona-Olympiacos-Juventus come out as the final choices. Imagine, for example, PAOK and City throwing it out of options!
Will you tell me but are they sure they will play such low odds? No, but the majority of contestants from scratch follow this pattern with thirty small odds of up to 1,65. The system is immediately affected if, for example, a substitute, instead of following the classic pattern followed by the average member, starts playing for example Espanyol-Ebyar X or Sociedad-Alaves X and appears to someone recording what top picks they choose participating members.I noticed this from the recording