Here the issue is somewhere deeper and it is not a matter of vaccinators or vaccinators.
Initially, if I understood correctly, every athlete who wants to participate in the AO must either be vaccinated with one of the vaccines that have been approved in the western world or if he is not to submit a special request for exemption. For the 2nd, a special file must be submitted to the medical committee of the AO, in which the reason for its non-vaccination must be presented.
In this committee there is the excuse "of the recent infection by. Covid-19 in the last 6 months". So based on what we read today, Novak testified that he contracted the virus in mid-December.
In addition to this Commission, each unvaccinated athlete must submit the same dossier to a 2nd Medical Committee in the Melbourne State.
So these 2 envelopes were submitted and Djokovic got the green light to participate.
But there was also a 3rd in which he had a foul.
The state of Australia issues some visas with a specific validity. Novak had already obtained his visa some time ago. But the new instructions there say that in order to enter, one must now have a visa that has been recently validated and this is done by the consulate and the excuse of the recent infection is not acceptable. If someone is not vaccinated, they will have to prove why, with medical evidence regardless of whether they have recently contracted or not.
eg have a serious allergy etc.
Djokovic not only did not have such a file but when they saw a visa without the new information, he was immediately thrown out ...
As one understands, Djokovic tries to put all the blame on the AO and the medical committee that gave him the green light, but the state is above all and has its own laws, regardless of whether an event turns a blind eye.
Also, based on current data, he talks about an illness in mid-December and on the same day he appears to be awarded in a public place. And in the coming days they will come out and more. So one can definitely assume many different ...
However, his great opponents exposed him, saying that he knew what the conditions were for you to enter the country.
PS: The big political issue (if it is true) is that it sounds like some of his colleagues have passed through the country with the same visa, with the same medical exceptions. If this is the case, then there is the question of why they use No1 for political gain for lockdowns ...