Online gambling for a few and powerful

[kerkireos]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

Yes, as it is known, the companies TURNING may have to give 100 a Euro bonus.

 

[Balaton]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

Yes, as it is known, the companies TURNING may have to give 100 a Euro bonus.

Obviously, they tremble when 1000 new accounts play odds of 1,10 or 1,15 or 1,20, and they have to pay for 700. Saw; I say that 300 (which is very big number will lose). If it was and did not hurt you, I would say you would play whatever match you want, but they do not say it because they know they will drink it! Do not play a zero-rake match, do not play under 1,65, do not play with a small profit because it is irregular. Do they end up playing the bonus instead of the account opening world?

 

[kerkireos]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

If they were crazy, they could, with my poor mind, not give up a bonus. Not to think about it, how stupid ...

 

[Balaton]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

If they were crazy, they could, with my poor mind, not give up a bonus. Not to think about it, how stupid ...

But the way they offer it is for sure that 90% of the players will lose it! One 10% and I say a lot! Do not tell 5 at 100 will be able to grab the terms!

 

[GATHS]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

And if the companies were not afraid of the small odds series they would not say in the world odds below 1,65 do not count them in the turnover! They would say to the world that you want performance!

Does the verification rate be such for small odds where players will lose hard? in the company it is not enough after 1000 euro turnover the player to lose eg 60 with these odds because in practice he will be won since he will be left to the player 40 euro withdrawn from the bonus. I think they do not want the small odds in the turnover when they have given a bonus. Without a bonus let them lose 60 euros in 1000 turnover the player a lucky profit I consider to be for the company, of course not as a sum, other than the risk he undertakes to pay on 1,20 1,30 returns.

 

[GATHS]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

Let's say that it is being issued exactly for that reason you say and not for the reason that Funbet said.

Most of the players who won a 4.000 or 5.000 year without a freebet, do not declare their winnings and did not ask for earnings, nor are they required to declare them through a profit statement.

If the reason for the testimonies exists was exactly what you said (it is to declare money that has been taxed at their source) then it would be all the players obliged to declare them as they are amounts that have been taxed at their source.
However, it is not up to the player to declare them. And those who say it, they usually do so to justify markets or to be legally covered if they check their bank account.

For all I am absolutely sure is that the attestations are to say something, and not to not meet the tax collector. of course if it helps and to that, it is not for that, I gave at least 2 cases where you can meet him.
Amounts are taxed at their source! so it does not show, not a tax, but not a solidarity levy! this may not be of interest to the state, because it does not profit from their declaration while it is profitable by those who could declare it voluntarily and do not declare it because they have no obligation, ie ignorance !!!
You know and you will ask for a certificate for the car you will buy and cover the amount, the other who does not know will pay a tax! if it becomes mandatory then the state will lose a tax from the one who does not know and pays with today's data!

 

[blizzard]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

Hmm you put me in thoughts.

First of all, for the player who plays his 7 bonus, his friend was right because with 2 7s on 5 100 bets you make a profit of 1200 euros and you have not yet completed your Turnov.
(not that the 40% success rate on 7 is easy, but it's not one in the 50 I said before.

Now why not play with 1.5 which would very easily complete his bonus turnover, but "all or nothing" with 7, and we have cancellations and issues with the company, is a question.


I take as an example the classic bonus of bet365 in big games that we all have to play ... play 5 euro before the match, and we give you freebet 5 Euro in the games,
Do not polite, you play 1.85 (this is 50% but with rake) and before and in the live, you count 4 as possible (2, 2 and 5 and 7 XNUMX) and finally XNUMX should be XNUMX totally random choices .. it's like a sure bet bet that they do to get through well.

The win does not apply if the second choice of freebet play 1.20 (they leave) because the profit is too small to cover the rake damage on the first bet.

And now I wonder if it's best to play 7 against 1,85 that I do ... I can not get it mathematically.
And even if the bonus case is better, the better is the bigger the money, it's an ideal way to take advantage of it and the readers have fallen)

 

[goal2]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

Amounts are taxed at their source! so it does not show, not a tax, but not a solidarity levy! perhaps that's why it does not interest the state to declare it necessary because on the one hand it does not profit from their statement while it is profitable by those who could declare them voluntarily and do not declare it since they have no obligation, that is from ignorance !!!
You know and you will ask for a certificate for the car you will buy and cover the amount, the other who does not know it will pay a tax! if it becomes mandatory then the state will lose a tax from the one who does not know and pays with today's data!

Yes you have that. The only sure thing is that he does not escape who has indigence. Plus, banks even ask you to declare a customer profile if they see incoming money transfers, without necessarily huge amounts.

 

[Balaton]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

Does the verification rate be such for small odds where players will lose hard? in the company it is not enough after 1000 euro turnover the player to lose eg 60 with these odds because in practice he will be won since he will be left to the player 40 euro withdrawn from the bonus. I think they do not want the small odds in the turnover when they have given a bonus. Without a bonus let them lose 60 euros in 1000 turnover the player a lucky profit I consider to be for the company, of course not as a sum, other than the risk he undertakes to pay on 1,20 1,30 returns.

It is not ******* the player to wait for the 1000 Euros to withdraw when he does not get the bonus. At doubles he will take his money back and try to play them with their money!

 

[GATHS]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

It is not ******* the player to wait for the 1000 Euros to withdraw when he does not get the bonus. At doubles he will take his money back and try to play them with their money!

Yes Correctly the player can follow which strategy he thinks best out of bonus, I tried to say that I think the company does not tremble the Small Odds just to the bonus because of the verification rates, they will earn part of the bonus.

 

[anon]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

Easy play eg to score a goal in the second half in 1,20 performance and replay initial bet and profit. Will you tell me some match will not break you? I do not necessarily need 14 strong seats to score after 55. Watch out I'm not forced to play on a 14 SK match I can play 7 matches one month and 7 the next and get 1000 Euro. A can also eat a goal so for me it is. Will you do what you say? Worse against 90% yeah?

Or I have lost somewhere, or you went so arbitrarily from ~ 8% to 90%. And with 15% value playing 1.2, you'll be marginally in coin flip, aka 50-50.

 

[Balaton]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

Does 8% result? That because the chances are finally reverted to 8%? Probably somewhat like that? No problem you are right, 87.5% does not apply 8% no problem!

 

[JordanRules]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

However, friend goal2 is not only stoiximan, but also other companies that do the same.

unfortunate that it appears that the earnings confirmation is not withdrawals less deposits = net profit (as we would have liked)
but they are winning bets less lost bets

I'm facing the same problem with you. I asked for a company statement and told me euro, while my net earnings are 10x (withdrawals)
but they tell me that the attestation does not come out on the basis of what I thought.

I do not know and I do not think I'm going to get along, because there is a common line of companies, maybe the EYEP itself has set the attestation.

perhaps because there is an in-kind donation, so for money that has not been taxed at their source, it is not legal to declare it as tax-free profits, since on the basis of Greek absurdity even your own donate 1000 euro, if you do the tax returns, you pay 10% tax !!!!

it is obvious that companies declare free bets / full bets / bonuses as donations (like a professional who donates a service to a relative and cuts a free invoice / receipt) is not taxed naturally for them, but that's why they can not give us and a certificate for them. otherwise an employer could make a lot of donations to employees (where in substance it would be black money), would have been provided by 1 at everybody and would have a whole lot of money off duty.

this naturally does not apply because, together with the dried eggs and the green, the state even the donation of your manna tax you more. somewhere we have pressed it and I think.

all above is reserved and based on the judgment (mainly this) and my little legal knowledge. I may also say hairs naturally. it is better to enlighten us an accountant

 

[JordanRules]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

also now that I think about it if it is true that the attestation of profits = withdrawals down deposits, which we naturally enjoyed naturally,
then all those who wanted to flush money would be deposited in every 10.000 company in late December, the Gennaris authorities would be tantalizing and would take the winnings immediately (and if only 9.000 were profits), they would not repeat anything over the whole year. so that year they had 0 deposits and 9.000 withdrawals. so 9.000 net profit, tax-free, flushed. if you do it on 20 companies = 180.000 euro.
and for 2 years you can do it, so all these 180.000 Euros would wash out every two years, which would look like tax-free income and would justify infinite purchases that would be legalized to do.
I say every 2 years, because one year will burn due to deposit at the end of December. The 2nd with the turnover and the beginning of January will be the "productive".
But now that the "bets you won minus the bets you lost" is valid, not all of them can do that, because if they play 10.000 and have 9.000 left after the turnover, then they are lost.
we unfortunately touch it with them as well, as I said before, with the dried out and the green

 

[goal2]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

unfortunately it does the earnings statement is not withdrawals less deposits = net profit (as we would like)
but they are winning bets less lost bets

I'm facing the same problem with you. I asked for a company statement and told me euro, while my net earnings are 10x (withdrawals)
but they say so the attestation does not come out on the basis of what I was thinking.

Fairy tales.
Here is one last year. So you withdraw this deposit, it just wrote, nothing else.

,why there is a common line of companies, it may even be that the EERP has so designated the attestation.

She has not defined anything else. Another attestation from another company last year wrote that I did the same gains without reporting deposits as much as this. It was also stated as normal. As they like to get the assertions.
How do you like them? I do not know. Otherwise, I have earned both sign up bonuses and other bonuses, but I normally put them on the attestation.

I do not know and I do not think I'm going to go out

I know it, you will not go out. In Greece we live.
He enjoyed conversations with another licensed company.
What did they initially answer when I asked to send me a certificate of profit,
and what next in the following days:

[FONT = &] "Confirming your winnings is your betting activity on our page." [/ FONT]

So, he says, go to your accountant log on to your account, he counts your bets all, roi yield etc. and passes them to the paycheck.


The next day after I asked them they did not understand what I asked:

[FONT = &] "Based on the data protection and taking into account the high security standards followed by the company, we can not provide you with this document." [/ FONT]

I was afraid. Their answer:

[FONT = &] "We have informed our legal department and we will settle it as soon as possible" [/ FONT]

And after 2 passed, their ... legal department suspected that apart from valuebettor I might also be gags:

[FONT = &] "Having in mind the provisions of the Greek Legislation-Committee for Supervision and Supervision of Games (Government Gazette B '3162 / 25-11-2014) we can not provide you with the specific certificate of winnings. "[/ FONT]

When I said this too, I did not deal with old. Until after a week I have been doing this:

[FONT = &]"Following your request for the certificate of earnings for the year 2018, we would ask you to complete the application for winnings which is in the attachments"


[/ FONT]

They decided it out.

somewhere we have pressed it and I think.

We have not pressed it either. But it's too big, or we only play in a company. Ask another.

 

[goal2]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

also now that I think about it if it is true that the attestation of profits = withdrawals down deposits, which we naturally enjoyed naturally,
then all those who wanted to flush money would be deposited in every 10.000 company in late December, the Gennaris authorities would be tantalizing and would take the winnings immediately (and if only 9.000 were profits), they would not repeat anything over the whole year. so that year they had 0 deposits and 9.000 withdrawals. so 9.000 net profit, tax-free, flushed. if you do it on 20 companies = 180.000 euro.
and for 2 years you can do it, so all these 180.000 Euros would wash out every two years, which would look like tax-free income and would justify infinite purchases that would be legalized to do.
I say every 2 years, because one year will burn due to deposit at the end of December. The 2nd with the turnover and the beginning of January will be the "productive".
But now that the "bets you won minus the bets you lost" is valid, not all of them can do that, because if they play 10.000 and have 9.000 left after the turnover, then they are lost.
we unfortunately touch it with them as well, as I said before, with the dried out and the green

Yes it is logical what you say, but if it was defined by the EEPO then all companies would write in the document played what they won. But they do not all go out that way. Some companies like yours on the screen report withdrawals as much as they did, only that, when ...

 

[blizzard]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

. Some companies, like yours on the screen, report withdrawals of such deposits, only this, when ...

That's what the friend said too logically, this can only happen in the first year ... if you did in the second you could actually show false profits and mock damage in the first year.
So reasonably they have instructed them to do it differently,

 

[goal2]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

That's what the friend said too logically, this can only happen in the first year ... if you did in the second you could actually show false profits and mock damage in the first year.
So reasonably they have instructed them to do it differently,

Read what we are writing to not write jambs themselves and the same 2 and 3 times.
According to the certificates I had received, and not with the "logic" and "if", they have not been given any instructions on how to issue the certificates.
I have affirmations that one company has written withdrawals of such deposits, without mentioning how many have been played and returns.
And assurances from other record companies are that they have been returned, without writing down such deposits.
Also, as I wrote yesterday in a previous comment, another company has also calculated the amount of bonuses it has given me.

 

[JordanRules]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

I have affirmations that one company has written withdrawals of such deposits, without mentioning how many have been played and returns.
And assurances from other record companies are that they have been returned, without writing down such deposits.
Also, as I wrote yesterday in a previous comment, another company has also calculated the amount of bonuses it has given me.

hmm ...
I did not expect that.
classic Greece. there is bang.
no common line.
so be sure to get the edge and get the right assurance if you have a lot of offers

 

[blizzard]

Answer: Online gambling for a few and powerful

Read what we are writing to not write jambs themselves and the same 2 and 3 times.
According to the certificates I had received, and not with the "logic" and "if", they have not been given any instructions on how to issue the certificates.
I have affirmations that one company has written withdrawals of such deposits, without mentioning how many have been played and returns.

I repeat why you did not understand .... if they did what you say over the first year and without getting them all means they are helping you to make profits any year it suits you. correctly ?
So, logically, they did this just in the first year, and generally they do not do it this way.

Now for them they are not so important, of course, and maybe they did it for you if you cried I do not know, but there are directives for every case and tax collectors and companies for everything to get away with it?

Your rental income tells you the year you owe it and you owe it to you, they do not let you know when you got it.

ΥΓ
Another bonus, and another completely free gift without any risk or obligation of yours (except to play your gift I think once) that the bettor constantly makes and I have only seen it there ... said this before.