Good evening.
We can say about 7 match, which we saw in this video live that in the end it is better that we did not play something pregame because that way we "escaped" from some defeats.
This does not sound particularly important, because the goal is to play and win. not just not to lose. On the other hand, think that in a one-season marathon, not getting a goal is as important as scoring.
So far we have been watching 53 live game with average performer pregame at 8.43.
From 53 match, finally the underdog passed on 8 (7.90 average performance).
We of them 53 these matches, we played "only" in 7 match and we won the 2. That is until now we have been watching 53 match to win 2. For some this may be horribly boring for others it may have an interest.
If someone played all the matches with a fixed bet of one pregame unit, they would have after 53 matches, +10.3 Profit Units. A good profit, but whoever went like that, would also pull the "hassle" of many "buckets" in a row (up to 17 in a row we counted), which in real life can discourage the player.
The one who went lively, (on the other hand) from the 8 points that passed, couldn't take advantage of the 6, to say the least. This could also be a problem with this strategy. But the minimal risk exposure with just 7 bets played in the lively even with just 2 successes changes the data.
These are, of course, so far why the recording continues.
For today in the lively we have scored the match Midland - Randers (6.50).
Before stopping I think it would be at the limits of sans voir.
Now, after stopping, the match is eligible for live.