Stoiximan 0%

[Pro]

Why did not you count it?
And if you think I'm not winning, why not play back and win? do you find no point in making money like that? do you know that if you play the backs of one losing, at 0 rake you always win?

This is the 0 rake and it's ALL the meaning of the bet, you can win, or anyway, the simplest and easiest, everyone can do it, but you have to understand it first.

I'm winning at the moment, but it's not that mean we said that's why I do not care to say follow ... if you work the mind to understand what is 0 rake you will never have any guru ever need again.

ΥΓ
The bettor also has the bonuses, so if you do not play a lot of money it is practically impossible to lose at 0 rake ... it makes a lot of sense and especially if you understand what it is and have patience.


Edit: I did not end up, though I did not have the purpose ... I may have made some laughs but here are all the 0 rake that I saw I wrote what I play in this local.

FEDERER - NADAL 0.25
PORTUGAL - NETHERLANDS -1
SPAIN - SWEDEN -1
TORONTO - GOLLAND - 1
Golden State Worces 1.73 - Toronto Raptors 2.35 1.35
01: 00 Argentina - Colombia 2.20 - 3.30 - 4.10 0.82 (played x2)
01: 00 Uruguay - Ecuador 1.87 - 3.40 - 5.80 0.87
02: 00 Japan - Chile - 7.20 - 4.20 - 1.60 0.6
03: 30 Argentina - Paraguay 1,50 - 4,50 - 8,75 -1
02: 00 Uruguay - Japan 1.29 - 6.15 - 15.00 3.3 (x2)
22: 00 Barcelona - Real 1.78 - 2.28 1.28
02: 00 Ecuador - Chile 4.15 - 3.70 - 2.03 -1
02: 00 Chile - Uruguay 3.75 - 3.55 - 2.20 1.2
PRODUCER-1
02: 00 Colombia - Chile 2.30 - 3.25 - 3.85 1.3
22: 00 Uruguay - Peru 1.76 3.65 6.20 -1
03: 30 Brazil - Argentina 1.78 3.70 5.80 0.78
03: 30 Chile - Peru 1.90 3.50 5.25 -1
22: 00 Argentina - Chile 1.95 3.75 4.50 -1
22: 00 Ghana - Tunisia 2.56 3.05 3.55 2.05
20: 45 Sarajevo - Celtic 8.20 4.25 1.55 -1

total 3.8 in 20 matches.

It's a start .... Well, so you have 3,8 profit in 20 races.

 

[blizzard]

22¨00 Nigeria - South Africa 2.18 3.12 4.45

South Africa has brought 0-0 at half-time in the last 6 races, with few opportunities, and when it is a little more open to 2, it is more likely to eat ... but the best team of the Tournament has borrowed, missed opportunities and puts the goal in a counterattack .
Nigeria made a 3-2 tip over and a very good game with Cameroon, so it comes in for a moment, but it can do it if it does not.

The logical result that many suggest is 1-0 if Nigeria has patience ... if a goal is scored it is difficult to change, but here we will play 2 with x no bet for the surprise, and because the goalbet has 2.25 the ace, we will not get at 2.18 on 0 rake.

It's a start .... Well, so you have 3,8 profit in 20 races.

Principle of what ??? I'm not sure but I do not understand what I told you about what the 0 rake is .....

It's like playing 100 guys a game of luck and skill without a book getting them rates; they're all the same, who find the result they get the money clean and honest.
NEVER tell someone "what is the point of playing after you lose" ..... or you will laugh, it is stupid.

This is what you do in a rake game ... whoever thinks he's winning but nursing the brutes,

ΥΓ
In a nutshell, here we say our views on 0 racing ... I hope we get 5-10 to say our opinions, to see who is right and who is wrong and how to improve our game, the same value has the wrong with the right one, and there is no brute so it makes sense to improve on such a game.
It is NOT a game we are looking for the guru to follow because it breaks the rake, it is NOT that meaning of 0 rake.

 

[Pro]

22¨00 Nigeria - South Africa 2.18 3.12 4.45

South Africa has brought 0-0 at half-time in the last 6 races, with few opportunities, and when it is a little more open to 2, it is more likely to eat ... but the best team of the Tournament has borrowed, missed opportunities and puts the goal in a counterattack .
Nigeria made a 3-2 tip over and a very good game with Cameroon, so it comes in for a moment, but it can do it if it does not.

The logical result that many suggest is 1-0 if Nigeria has patience ... if a goal is scored it is difficult to change, but here we will play 2 with x no bet for the surprise, and because the goalbet has 2.25 the ace, we will not get at 2.18 on 0 rake.



Principle of what ??? I'm not sure but I do not understand what I told you about what the 0 rake is .....

It's like playing 100 guys a game of luck and skill without a book getting them rates; they're all the same, who find the result they get the money clean and honest.
NEVER tell someone "what is the point of playing after you lose" ..... or you will laugh, it is stupid.

This is what you do in a rake game ... whoever thinks he's winning but nursing the brutes,

ΥΓ
In a nutshell, here we say our views on 0 racing ... I hope we get 5-10 to say our opinions, to see who is right and who is wrong and how to improve our game, the same value has the wrong with the right one, and there is no brute so it makes sense to improve on such a game.
It is NOT a game we are looking for the guru to follow because it breaks the rake, it is NOT that meaning of 0 rake.

If you are not going to make a profit for a family owner to spoil your time and money by reading your posters and playing the ones you suggest each time?

 

[blizzard]

To understand what 0 is rabbit friend ... is another thing than you knew so far.

In 0 ganita if you play in luck you DO NOT Lose ...
If you choose very badly you will lose a little, and if you do the opposite you will win, it is like playing with your friends and having fun without anyone eating your money, the good devours and the boss has no job and does not care, never makes you a limit.
If you see that you lose you can choose the opposite and win, or do the same for suggestions you hear, if you just play in luck, you will not follow any gurus and you have to behave differently, I do not know how to tell net,.


In regular rake betting, where they lose ALL , you want a gurus who can break the rake and bankrupt the betting company, he'll tell you what and when to play, what performance and to which boss you are going to exploit their mistakes, and if you follow a lot of difficult to eat limet , so it's a profit.
There it is, and you will lie to him and make that complex and that laughs to anyone who says he beats the rake and eventually nourishes the beasts.

 

[Pro]

To understand what 0 is rabbit friend ... is another thing than you knew so far.

In 0 ganita if you play in luck you DO NOT Lose ...
If you choose very badly you will lose a little, and if you do the opposite you will win, it is like playing with your friends and having fun without anyone eating your money, the good devours and the boss has no job and does not care, never makes you a limit.
If you see that you lose you can choose the opposite and win, or do the same for suggestions you hear, if you just play in luck, you will not follow any gurus and you have to behave differently, I do not know how to tell net,.


In regular rake betting, where they lose ALL , you want a gurus who can break the rake and bankrupt the betting company, he'll tell you what and when to play, what performance and to which boss you are going to exploit their mistakes, and if you follow a lot of difficult to eat limet , so it's a profit.
There it is, and you will lie to him and make that complex and that laughs to anyone who says he beats the rake and eventually nourishes the beasts.

Nice I do not miss!
Whenever you read and bet on what you say I will make a profit ... I expect your games.

 

[blizzard]

The ANTITHEAT LEO .....

You follow and you win the gurus playing with GANITA ... they have eaten lime, they have driven them and so they do not win themselves, so maybe they can tell you what to play to win the bosses,

Here he has neither limit nor bosses, so why can someone tell you what to play? owes you money; The only purpose is to show you how to play and the best one to win.

ΥΓ
Do you know her the saying it says if you give a fish to hungry from your fish, will ask for more and in the end will burst? while if he shows him the sea he can go out on his own.
It's just stupid to give ready fish to some, and also stupid to ask for ready food when the sea is next, open to everyone with equal odds and without a bum, you know what to do, swim.

We will all say opinions, you will choose the good and you will play the opposite of the bad, you will not follow me or none because you have lost all meaning.

 

[Pro]

In 0 ganita if you play in luck you DO NOT Lose ...

That's what you wrote a while ago.

 

[blizzard]

Ivory Coast - Algeria 3.90 3.05 2.40
4 wins Algeria scoring very easily even when it is not better, 3 wins the Coast that also puts goals but I read that it does workouts for defense and penalty shootout before the match ...

So we go X,

Yes, with 0 rake you do not lose if you play in luck , with rake you always lose.
With 0 rake it's like playing between friends without a bum, the rake is made for everyone to lose.
With 0 rake you are looking to improve and look at the opinions of everyone ... with rake you are looking for the fault of the beast, and those who can find it and tell you that happened, carefully because they play lime if you overdo it.
Another behavior in one, the other ... in a fight with 0 rake never tell one of what you said, or the assistant to play the opposite, or you play them and you win

 

[blizzard]

17: 00 (to 18: 00) Rafael Nadal 1.80 Roger Federer 2.24
Here I will play that they say the most prominent if they disagree on the street.

https://www.infobeto.com/forum/threads/wimbledon-2019.134487/page-16#post-1214639

ΥΓ
If you do not specifically say something I do not understand from the cemeteries ... teppa we put an example for whoever is a practical guy.

- Olympiacos - Panathinaikos play in the basketball, and Olympiacos because he's better (because I'm sorry) he's likely to win 2 at 3 times Pao, 66% 1.50 - 3.00

For some reason, people can believe in Panathinaikos (reason A2) and the odds have been set at 0 rake 2.0 - 2.0.
The upside can understand that Gavros is better, think the referees have minded and give 1.2 - 6.0 performance
(the company can not do much in big fights where the world is playing money, and leaves it where it goes)

The one who plays in luck ... where he sees performance 2.0 - 2.0 will play one at the other ... where he sees 1.2 -6.0 will play 5 times asso and 1 double.
And in 2 cases, do not lose money .... for a result that comes 2 to 3, that a zero rake performance to play in luck, will you be in the money? you,
(eg if you play 3 times ace and 3 times double with 2, you will earn 4 euros from Ace and 2 from double = 6 so in your money over time)

Who does not play in luck, and understand which 2 performance is good and plays more often than 50% will win ... and upside down the one who plays the badger will most often lose ... the good gets the money of evil.
If we find a player losing to 0 rake can win by playing upside down ... simple and terribly interesting, whoever bore it simply plays in luck as gambling and does not lose.

 

[Pro]

17: 00 (to 18: 00) Rafael Nadal 1.80 Roger Federer 2.24
Here I will play that they say the most prominent if they disagree on the street.

https://www.infobeto.com/forum/threads/wimbledon-2019.134487/page-16#post-1214639

ΥΓ
If you do not specifically say something I do not understand from the cemeteries ... teppa we put an example for whoever is a practical guy.

- Olympiacos - Panathinaikos play in the basketball, and Olympiacos because he's better (because I'm sorry) he's likely to win 2 at 3 times Pao, 66% 1.50 - 3.00

For some reason, people can believe in Panathinaikos (reason A2) and the odds have been set at 0 rake 2.0 - 2.0.
The upside can understand that Gavros is better, think the referees have minded and give 1.2 - 6.0 performance
(the company can not do much in big fights where the world is playing money, and leaves it where it goes)

The one who plays in luck ... where he sees performance 2.0 - 2.0 will play one at the other ... where he sees 1.2 -6.0 will play 5 times asso and 1 double.
And in 2 cases, do not lose money .... for a result that comes 2 to 3, that a zero rake performance to play in luck, will you be in the money? you,
(eg if you play 3 times ace and 3 times double with 2, you will earn 4 euros from Ace and 2 from double = 6 so in your money over time)

Who does not play in luck, and understand which 2 performance is good and plays more often than 50% will win ... and upside down the one who plays the badger will most often lose ... the good gets the money of evil.
If we find a player losing to 0 rake can win by playing upside down ... simple and terribly interesting, whoever bore it simply plays in luck as gambling and does not lose.

Well, I understood the theory. If you play with 0 ganita and you are read in the news of the particular match as if you are going to win. So you suggest points with 0 ganita and you are read about the specific points. So we follow your points and no problem at all.

 

[Silver]

You do not even have to read 0% rake. The other companies read about you. Then a company that you trust to read correctly e.g. Pinnacle who is a big giant, and you have a certain profit.

 

[Silver]

Let's say at the moment the Pinnacle odds in the tennis match are these ...

 

[Silver]

And in stoiximan they are ... If you trust the bookmakers of the best company in the world with the smallest rake in all the matches, of Pinnacle, that they get the right odds, when millions are played in this company, you can find what to play in stoiximan.

 

[Silver]

Will you prefer 2,20 (which even though you play it with 0%, is there a higher-performance company with a rake inside) or 1,82 that you find it at the best price in the world market?

 

[blizzard]

16: 00 Serena Williams 1.58 Simona Chalen 2.70
I can not stand Serena again in big fights and when she can run ... her bumps are even louder and different from each other.

 

[blizzard]

22: 00 Senegal - Algeria 3.00 - 3.00 - 3.00
I have not seen it at all, but you can play in luck at 0 rake I will not play in such a nice balanced x?

 

[BlacKMamba]

But why do not you ask why?

 

[BlacKMamba]

But why do not you ask why?

I understand .... it only changes the site to the affiliate program link. I saw myself

 

[blizzard]

20: 00 Victoria Plzen - Olympic 2.50 - 3.40 - 3.25
The odds have changed quite a bit in this match, from the friendly and 2 championship matches we can see that 2 can score and easily score, but you know they will be serious now .... go to X

 

[syllektikos]

Very open indeed. It's not a bad tie. Maybe a goal and a goal would work. In the meantime, the Czechs have gone down without 4 basic defense ... Good luck to all.