Value or Sure?

[Fairplay]

I think the issue got a little out of the original query but I didn't calculate the blizard factor.
It really reminds me of the ad that says 29 laundry makers are skip, well I think we found out who this 30 is
However, many jokes can be written about the style the blizard eats yogurt only 0% (no offense, I'm joking)
Seriously now, I also classify myself into people who are irrelevant to the bet but try to read and learn new things and listen to the advice of the most experienced ones, and I think I've learned enough from the kids here.
But you my little brother, you have made so many comments on different threads and you always say the same. ALWAYS!
The only thing that really changed is the example, Panathinaikos Olympiakos became PAOK Ajax.
Look I don't think you disagree that the existence of a rake is worse than zero, the disagreement lies in the fact that you present it as the hidden treasure you have discovered with no proof of what you just call arbitrary number theories.
I think it is now clear that there are two possibilities either that you are swampy or that you are single-eyed in the blind. So I'll open those two up
Swamp @1.40
One-eyed @3.50
And I'm afraid I'm a mess like a trader because so many people here will see the value of 1.40 and close my shop.

PS did you notice the rake?

Sanctify your keyboard .

Before the others catch up with me, I go all in at 1,40......

 

[Fairplay]

I don't know why, but instead of qazdas, goal2 appears, but who cares?

 

[FunBet]

I don't know why but instead of "stoiximan" it shows "blizzard" eeeeee "gamer" I wanted to say!

 

[playmaker]

I don't know why but instead of "stoiximan" it shows "blizzard" eeeeee "gamer" I wanted to say!

at what point exactly?

 

[FunBet]

you claim that everyone here in the betting market is either losing or playing with other accounts
interesting point of view, however, he disagrees and says that betting will understand you and close your account and keep your winnings

what about what?
because both are not happening at the same time

Both are true, supposedly irrelevant my friend, who supposedly overflows with a pure thirst for knowledge. Whoever plays with the cross in hand is eaten by the rake and never eats a limit. Anyone who plays pregame sure bets goes home immediately. Whoever plays live sure bets goes home on the next route. Anyone who plays value bets goes home much later. Anyone who opens accounts with third-party details and makes a fatal mistake (connects from the same machine or same ip), loses profits and capital.

You act like you don't know, but know that the more you play the betting lawyer with ridiculous and argumentative arguments, the more you will provoke the reaction of the commentators, which will lead to the opposite results of what you desire.

thanks for stpsilan reply
that was the reason I signed up for this site, to find out if the accounts are limited
unfortunately this very serious issue became a playground for some, i won't expand
so i will neither ask myself again nor ask if it is legal and if the law protects the player etc

i will focus on this:




then why do you care?
and do you even bring your relatives and friends into legal adventures?

Very comfortable. You don't concern yourself with whether capping is legal and whether the law protects the player, but you take it for granted that playing with your brother's details (after the betting limit) is illegal. Too convenient a logical leap! Convenient for betting, of course! So of course the bookies are charities and that's why they don't take legal action against third parties or punters using their details and not because they're going to open Aeolus's purse, so in this case they might suffer a huge legal defeat .

 

[qatarianos]

I say your account cannot be limited LIMITED you win

yes, if it is easy for you, show us something that proves that you are limited to Stihiman
and if you allow me, i want to show them and explain why it happened

I sent you screenshots of max bet leaving me. Do you think I'm lying? I am waiting for you to answer me with a simple yes or no, nothing more.
Also, I don't have any answer from bettors because I didn't deal with it further, given that at some point the limit would be reached by such scams, so there was no point in contacting them.
After all, you asked me if I would allow you to ask them why this happened.
So I allow you, I am sending you a private message and my username and I am waiting for you to send me what they replied to you.
Do we disagree somewhere?
I am waiting for you to answer me with yes or no if you think that the screenshot I sent is fake.

Sent from my BLA-L29 using Tapatalk

 

[playmaker]

before joining the thread i didn't know there are people with negative iq

 

[playmaker]

I sent you screenshots of max bet leaving me. Do you think I'm lying? I am waiting for you to answer me with a simple yes or no, nothing more.

I'm saying the obvious
that proves nothing


no, I will not be the mediator
as I told you before, come in and ask them if they limited you and tell us

 

[Ertzan]

I think the subject has been lost once again. So I see no reason for them to exist and continue so it is locked. I hope the friend who opened it got the answers he wanted.

Player banned in 1 month come back hopefully calmer as I hope you calm down too