We have found that not only is the definition of value misused by players (small and bad) but mainly that few understand that betting logic is working properly.
I explain everything here and I will add that to be understood by as many people as possible can understand ... everything is explained logically and with mathematics
1) - Value is a specific performance at any given time of the two that has a match, which sets a percentage - probability of being verified which is lower than the actual odds of the match for that point.
Simply put, if you bet on such points many times, you are more likely to make money than you have to lose ...
a) It doesn't matter which team bets the most wins, the return is up, down, sure bets or whatever.
2) - The smaller the rake the higher the value ... ideally the 0 rake because there is the highest possible value in all cases and surely one of your 2 options will have value.
a) When a performance drops, it does not mean it has value, it may never have,
b) A sure bet performance may not have value, one of the 2s being fake. of limited edition coke or whatever, and the second one has no value.
3) THE VALUE OF THE GAME IS DETERMINED BY THE WORLD TO PLAY AND THE MASS AND QUALITY thereof ... here is the most serious point, and few have understood it because few have betting logic and the ability to verify mathematics at least a little.
a) When people play enormous and huge amounts of money and value, the bookmaker and every mediator cannot interfere seriously with returns and value.
b) When people play small amounts, then the coke. or good players, and in general any mediator can change odds and value more easily.
c) When the percentage of good players is high, the value can be easily changed by them and reduced or lost ...
d) When the percentage of bad players - mass is high, the value will jump and nobody will control it ...
In a FEW words, we play great games with 0 rake, for more value, which one cannot stop ... always counting on the mass playing at the end and not with it, and we also have the assurance that no one will limit us,
They all have mathematical and logical proofs, which I will put here for information so as not to get lost and repeat again ....
---------------
1) Simple Mathematical Basic Betting Problem ....
Here is an example that few players have the ability to understand and process today, both as a starting point and as proof of the enormous problem of Andrea Papandreou's education that literally detracted from children's critical application of parroting and paranoia.
1) The first bet started in the village ... the Vlachs put beans on which cow would give birth first green or red and gave them to the president.
2) The president wrote them down, telling them every morning how many beans were in the green and how many in the red cow and how many beans his percentage was,
3) Smart players looked at the laughs, listened to the moans, and mainly looked at what beans each had to see how much risk they would take and if it was worth it ... the stupid ones did more simple things like when they were gutted and how much her belly .... the good ones were winning.
4) In the big bets they came from the surrounding villages and the town for the festival and they too ... there was a loss and it was a chance for every citizen to win, not just the good to win,
5) The mayor used to say don't play limit you, don't waste all your money on guests and don't come back, get the value I get too.
6) This problem could have been solved in the old days because they had applied logic ... but they understood that they had to go against the mass, and it was worth the money ....
Today kids can't understand it and solve it ... they will tell you that mass and big fights are of no value, the 0 rake is a disaster, it will limit, and other things that in no case can and to explain reasonably
I explain everything here and I will add that to be understood by as many people as possible can understand ... everything is explained logically and with mathematics
1) - Value is a specific performance at any given time of the two that has a match, which sets a percentage - probability of being verified which is lower than the actual odds of the match for that point.
Simply put, if you bet on such points many times, you are more likely to make money than you have to lose ...
a) It doesn't matter which team bets the most wins, the return is up, down, sure bets or whatever.
2) - The smaller the rake the higher the value ... ideally the 0 rake because there is the highest possible value in all cases and surely one of your 2 options will have value.
a) When a performance drops, it does not mean it has value, it may never have,
b) A sure bet performance may not have value, one of the 2s being fake. of limited edition coke or whatever, and the second one has no value.
3) THE VALUE OF THE GAME IS DETERMINED BY THE WORLD TO PLAY AND THE MASS AND QUALITY thereof ... here is the most serious point, and few have understood it because few have betting logic and the ability to verify mathematics at least a little.
a) When people play enormous and huge amounts of money and value, the bookmaker and every mediator cannot interfere seriously with returns and value.
b) When people play small amounts, then the coke. or good players, and in general any mediator can change odds and value more easily.
c) When the percentage of good players is high, the value can be easily changed by them and reduced or lost ...
d) When the percentage of bad players - mass is high, the value will jump and nobody will control it ...
In a FEW words, we play great games with 0 rake, for more value, which one cannot stop ... always counting on the mass playing at the end and not with it, and we also have the assurance that no one will limit us,
They all have mathematical and logical proofs, which I will put here for information so as not to get lost and repeat again ....
---------------
1) Simple Mathematical Basic Betting Problem ....
Here is an example that few players have the ability to understand and process today, both as a starting point and as proof of the enormous problem of Andrea Papandreou's education that literally detracted from children's critical application of parroting and paranoia.
1) The first bet started in the village ... the Vlachs put beans on which cow would give birth first green or red and gave them to the president.
2) The president wrote them down, telling them every morning how many beans were in the green and how many in the red cow and how many beans his percentage was,
3) Smart players looked at the laughs, listened to the moans, and mainly looked at what beans each had to see how much risk they would take and if it was worth it ... the stupid ones did more simple things like when they were gutted and how much her belly .... the good ones were winning.
4) In the big bets they came from the surrounding villages and the town for the festival and they too ... there was a loss and it was a chance for every citizen to win, not just the good to win,
5) The mayor used to say don't play limit you, don't waste all your money on guests and don't come back, get the value I get too.
6) This problem could have been solved in the old days because they had applied logic ... but they understood that they had to go against the mass, and it was worth the money ....
Today kids can't understand it and solve it ... they will tell you that mass and big fights are of no value, the 0 rake is a disaster, it will limit, and other things that in no case can and to explain reasonably