NOTHING like that ... the theory is valid and I proved it with 3-4 different logics, just here we do the step above with practical proof.The mistake you make is that you assume, because I do not know, that the company will make the mistakes equally up and down, ie it will be + -3%. So you in luck, one will be + and one -, so you will approach 0. Nobody knows that! Not even the company.
That's why we often end up seeing aces with odds of 2,00 and in one year have a 60% appearance.
You are also making the mistake of trying to explain the phenomenon by running a simulation. Do you know the Monty Hall problem? They ran a program there for simulation, but to prove the obvious, the theory, not the other way around.
(your theory is based only on "it's crazy to have a way of not losing by gambling" in skill games ... and yet it's true, we are not machines and we make mistakes)
I have no restrictions and conditions, I put 1000 odds and I will transfer there some real ones, you can set me the preconditions of the experiment in detail to do it, so that you can see the result.
1 euro bet on 1000 odds, I will get them from Opap, I can make them random if you want it is just more difficult, and also for results that will be random or whatever you want, for example to be the real odds results or to have some relationship you will tell me.
(I can put them randomly on opap, so they change and the results do not)
Whatever you want to see in practice what is obvious and with the theory ... you just have to tell me what to do so that you do not say later that it is not right or to see that you are right !!!
Last edited: