Revenge for the 3 round of the Champions League qualifiers.
Celtic was back with the back of the wall after 1 in Varsovia had lost with 4-1. The Polish played early in the semifinals with 2-1 and 44 'Celtic remained with a player less after Abrouz was eliminated. In 2 half-time the Poles pushed and managed to score more 2 goals with Ziro and Kozetsky.
After the defeat in Poland came the crash from Tottenham with 6-1 in a friendly match in a match played by the peaks.
On the other hand, Legia will go to Scotland with the mind in the back to guard the score of the first race. The Poles know that Celtic is very strong at their headquarters and as their coach Berg said nothing is over from the first race .
Absence Legea does not have, while from Celtic will miss punished Ambrose who broke the red card in the first fight and Brown.
Although it seems impossible for Celtic to overturn the score in the first race, I believe they will push from the start of the match and will be able to get at least the victory even with a goal difference.

A game played for half a year by Panathinaikos after winning the most of the Champions League and ensuring its presence in the Europa League groups. If this happens, there will be enough money in the funds, which are important for 2-3 transfers to strengthen the team.
In the first game in Liège, 2 teams had a good half-time with Stardar having some good chances in the first, while the greens took advantage of their best physical condition and lost plenty of opportunities to repeat better with a shot in Sidfeald's shot.
Panathinaikos will start 10 from 11 that started in Belgium with one place to play between Lagos and Mendez.
On the other hand, Standar will have a few changes in its tenth after Ezzekel (aggressive) was sold to Saudi Arabia while Marke and Millet stayed in Belgium due to stomach disorders. In the championship 2 / 2 wins with 3-0 against Charleroi and 3 -2 against Krograik (away).
The 2 teams were also faced with 2010 for 16 in the Europa League and the Belgians had 2 wins (3-1 at OAKA and 1-0 in Liege).
Arbitrator of the match will be Englishman Oliver.
I will bet on Panathinaikos based on the best physical condition he seems to have from the Player but also the fact that the Belgians will also have to deal with the high temperatures of Athens which are unusual. The Ace in odds over 2.00 is good enough.

Another game from Iran's 1 racing championship has a great betting interest, since we have a team traditionally strong at home and with pretty good material like Saipa facing the newly-born Naft Masjed Soleyman.

Saipa has goals high enough this year and they will use the advantage given to them by its headquarters and its people so that they can bend at least the worst teams of them. The guests are a mysterious group, as they made the big surprise last year and got the rise out of nowhere. But their material does not say much, nor have they made any very good transcript that made sense. Generally their material consists of players of teams of the second category.

I think the inexperience will cost Naft Masjed and in the end they will bend against such an experienced team as Saipa, with players such as Salehi and Ebrahimzadeh who can clear the game in the difficult time. 

Stoiximan.gr offers the best odds for the home team's victory, but because it gives the wrong name to the guest, whoever is afraid that his bet may be canceled by the company, exists at odds of 2.00 on 8bet.gr.

I keep my bet low, because it is the first game and as we saw yesterday and with Esteghlal, there may be several pitfalls. Another bet I played from this game is the Persepolis victory at 2.10, but now that performance has fallen to 1.70-1.80, I do not see any value in this bet.

Premier in Iran, which is generally a championship that I do not like at all to do with him and to bet on his teams, but in this game there is an opportunity and performance has already begun to fall.

Home team Rah Ahan is a scrappage team. The locals call it "the tournament circus". The chairman of the group is in jail, since there the laws are working on something like that, and Rah Ahan's overwhelming debts are no one to take over. Two auctions were made with the group being sold at a degrading price and no one was willing to take it. There was the thought of being eliminated from the championship, but it is a team with history and everything seems to be participating in this year's event. Of course everything can change before the center.

Esteghlal continues with coach Ghalenoi and this year he is enormously renewed after 22 has taken on new players. The situation in the group has reached the end of last year and a new Esteghlal is being built. They do not have bad players, but there is no player to stand out. There are several good tools that need to be coordinated to work the whole.

What keeps me on the low bet is the fact that Rah Ahan has no bad players either. At least the basic 11s are not players that have big differences from the rest of the teams. However, the situation in the team and the poor preparation made give a lead to Esteghlal and always at a premiere you expect the big team to start winning the new championship.

A friendly match held in the United Arab Emirates as part of the Al Ain tournament and has faced Saudi champion Al Nasr and Kuwait Al Kuwait.

Both teams have changed enough, with coaches new and new outsiders coming to the team. Both opponents have not yet completed their rosters, especially Al Kuwait has not yet managed to find the aggressor to replace Issam Jemaa, who has been the top scorer of the team in recent years, while Rogerio's loss is huge , the player who was the mind of the team in the center.

The reasons for betting on this friendly game are the following:

1st Al Nasr is in the 2nd week of preparation, while a team from Kuwait just started the day before yesterday. They are generally unprepared and have not yet completed their transfers.

2 Al Kuwait has more serious shortcomings, as 8 key players are with the national team and does not have the depth of Al Nasr to make up for the absences. 

I think there is value in winning Al Nasr, but because we are talking friendly, the bet remains low.

The last bet is the point. The basic analysis is found here Neimar is missing tonight as I pointed out at the beginning and until now Brazil played on Neimar base. So there are footballers who inspire you and when you have such as say you will not miss take Neimar or Messi, or Roben etc are players when you have in your team the confidence in yourself is more than normal, if you also remember from your childhood when we played a ball in the middle when we had the "best" we said "do not miss today" and let the others play as best they could. Nowadays this player does not play and the Germans do not "trust" a player but have a set of players who will not miss any replacements. Because I think this absence plays a role of Neimar and the Germans are more "integrated as a team I will go to the right but with X2, because we said it is a semifinals that can go to both the prolongation and the penalty shootout

I write my analysis here here I would like to add the importance of the game. Argentina with the closed defense of Switzerland did not find any places in the scoring and went into the extension. I also expect to be with Belgium. Belgium closed tightly and did not give space to Messi. On the other hand, Belgium knows Argentina and Messi opposite him and they certainly know and see like everyone else that a mistake can be fatal. So they will first "shield" their defense well and then think about scoring. In short, except for the X half-time I got to wait for the game to end and Under 2.5 where I will also get it.

Personally, I think there are some players who define everything in some groups. As Uruguay is a team without Suarez becoming joking, Argentina is a team that without Messi will never score, the Netherlands is a set that if Robben does not dissolve the opponent he will never win, so for Brazil Neymar is everything. The alpha and omega, the beginning and the end of the group.

Neymar's absence from the game with Germany is changing the overwhelming balance in favor of Europeans. Obviously, and not everything is over for Brazil, since Oscar is a player who can do quite a lot of what Neymar did on the pitch and there are always players who once made great years, such as Fred and Hulk, who have not yet help Brazil, but they always have the opportunity in the big fight to show their class and take the glory.

But Neymar is what everyone is waiting for, recognize his superiority and the whole Brazilian team has been built around this player who performs the corners, the foul, the penalty shootout, makes the assists, wins the foul around the area and is responsible for any Brazilian offensive phase and any imagination in their game at the moment.

The Germans are a team that knows how to take advantage of the opponent's weaknesses. It will be easier for them in these circumstances to keep Brazil away from their home, while the absence of Thiago Silva will give Germany the opportunity to tap into its foundations.

For me, Germany should be a favorite in this game, the performance that is given is excellent and already falls and will fall further. Well the people do and they bet in Germany, the situation is in favor. Because I do not want to get involved with the risks of the prolongation and the penalties, I will bet on Asian handicap 0, better known as draw no bet, waiting for Germany to qualify for the 90 minutes of the match.

The truth is that I can not believe Argentina is a clear favorite in this game, since both the appearance against Switzerland and the quality of Belgium make this game quite balanced and in my eyes Argentina's victory should is in 2.60 with 2.75 and not on the levels that are now.

Instead of a bet on the outcome of the match, I will choose to move on to the goals of the game and more specifically to the choice to score both teams, since I see it quite likely. The Belgians to America made 500 opportunities and Howard saved 600. Or something like that, since the American goalkeeper made a record of reprisals with 15 salvoes.

The Argentines do not have Howard, nor their defense is at American level. They have a much more funny defense and a much more unstable goalkeeper. If we see a Lukaku blame again, then it is certain that Belgium will find a way to score, since Argentina's defense is sure to give them enough chances.

Beyond that, we have to wait for the Argentines to score. They did not manage against Switzerland, but against Iran, they did it at 90, but now that they are likely to be in a situation of possible exclusion, the risks will become bigger and somehow they will have to score.

The goal / goal in a higher than 2.00 performance seems to be an option with good odds.

I think somewhere here are the Costa Rican adventures in this World Cup, as they seem to have reached their ceiling. To be honest, I do not believe that the Costa Rican should be in this quarter-final, but that's another story.

The Dutch were impressed with the comeback they made towards Mexico. This game went as I had figured out, Mexico made Hollander's life difficult and would take the game to prolong if Robben was not going. But there again the Dutch would be the ones who would win, so the only one we had left was a lost bet on X2.

Costa Rica has fought a lot and overcame it too many times, but now it goes to the quarter-finals with several absences, too tired and certainly not in the best situation that could be. The Dutch, on the other hand, seem to be very strong in the competition and able to overcome any difficulties, while taking advantage of 100% so far that it is probably the team with the best coach than the remaining team.

Robben's heroes will play a key role in the game, but I see the Netherlands currently having a strong lead and being in a better position than its opponents. Another important point for the race is Navas' performance and how much it will save. 

I think the Netherlands will find a way to open the score and from there it will be fatal that other goals will come.

A hool of the Hulk was enough for the Brazilian to get into a lot of problems and difficulties with the Chileans and get to risk their penchant for the penalty shootout. Otherwise, we would have an easy 2-0 and an easy qualification in the next phase.

That's how I expect the scenario of the fight with Colombia. I do not see big differences between Chile and Colombia, so there will be no difference for Brazil in relation to the game with Chile. I can see a big difference, that the Brazilians have already touched it once with Chile and now they know they will avoid the same problems from the Colombians.

I do not expect the scenario of the fight to change. The Brazilians will get strong, they will score first and then they will look to keep the result. If they do the same stupidity that Hulk did, they will score goals and run again. If they do not pay any mistake then they will put a second goal in the counter-attack and clear the game.

I see that it is worth a risk in the Brazilian victory over halftime, since if the Brazilians are not the first to score, we may not have any goals in this game, and if the Brazilians do not score in the first half, it will be difficult to take risks then the fight, because the stress is too great for them.

European conflict on Brazilian territory and will be something we see for the first time after the group stage. The impressive statistic here is that all of Europe's World Cup 2014 matches in the group stage ended not only with many goals but with many goals. We had scores like 1-5, 4-0 etc and only the match Belgium - Russia remained in the mild 1-0.

However, it is understandable that group matches differ in many of a quarter-finals, but that does not mean that we can not see a goal in such an important game. Both teams have not shown the best defensive behavior so far. When Nigeria and Algeria make a lot of your phases, you can not take pride in your defense. And for the Germans we also had them from the group when they got 2 goals from Ghana, while in the other serious game they played with America, we can not say that we had a sample since the Americans did not try to attack at any moment of the match.

The French were lucky to have the easiest team in the game, and while Honduras could not threaten them, they accepted 2 goals from the Swiss and saw Ecuador losing several big chances. Of course, if they were not so naive and frivolous in the final effort of the Nigerians, I do not know if the French could now be in this fight. Like the Germans, it would take many miracles if Neuer was not a guardian angel to the Algerians.

The unfortunate for both teams is that in this game they have for opponents players with enough quality. Benzema, Matuidi, Valbuena, Griezmann will hardly give the Germans the slightest mistake, as Muller, Gotze, Ozil will hardly leave any opportunity left to them.

I think both teams can score in this game. I have a little fear of finally seeing a soup and a good 0-0, but so far the two teams have shown that they went to Brazil to play a ball. The positive thing is that I'm sure we will see mistakes from the two teams. So opportunities will be given to their aggressors. The Germans will have several problems in the center with the unpredictable Khedira, who is said to take the position of Mustafi and Lahm will go right, while the French proved with Nigeria that only safe can not feel with their defense.

In 2.00 performance is worth the risk with the ambisolor.

The penultimate game of the 16 phase has undoubtedly a favorite, as it is extremely difficult to imagine Argentina losing to Switzerland and remaining outside the quarterfinals. Besides, it is quite rare for Argentina to stay out of 8, since it has only once been blocked at the 16 stage, 1994 from Romania.

The cynicity that Argentina faces this World Cup makes it a big favorite for the cup. They play as much as they need to get their winnings, all with 1 goal difference and all without being killed to give a spectacle to the world or to score many goals. If they give them opportunities they will take them, but they will not chase the rivalry of the opponent.

This, I think, is the right recipe for success for such events. The teams that want to win the event never try to exaggerate and let others steal the lights of publicity as long as they do their job.

The Argentinean cynical game is still waiting today. Now they have finished the group and they can not take risks. Maybe 3-5-2 returns to the premiere, but I certainly expect to see an Argentine that will not let its opponents become dangerous. He will try to control the ball and hold and wait for the opponents to score. And it is always difficult for Messi to come up with the solution.

The Swiss also do not expect to play with the naivety they played in the clubs. Their lesson took it to the crash of France, and now it does not even take them open lines to get off or leave the defense to its fate. 

I do not see the game open, I expect Argentina to score at some point and this 2-0 may be fatal. My first thought was the 2.5 under 2.10, but since I was given the best chance of winning the Argentine victory I think 3.5 will come, I'll take it.

The first of two battles between Europeans and Latin Americans takes place in Fortaleza, between two teams who have won many favorites in the first round of the World Cup and have received many good reviews for their racing behavior and readiness.

This game has fights on all fronts, since in addition to the battle on the pitch that looks ambiguous, the battle on the platform that has certainly won the Mexicans, there is also the battle on the bench between two great forms of world football, the great Luis Van Gaal and the creator of the great Club America Miguel Herrera. Both have proven to have their own madness and quirk and are top level coaches.

Mexico, based largely on America's big team in recent years and with some additions of quality players from European teams, managed to remain undefeated in the first round and steal the show with its appearances. A team that constantly presses into the center and consumes many kilometers without letting the rival take a break and exchange plenty of passes. They manage with 3-4 balloons to go into counter-attack and create opportunities when with Dos Santos and when with Peralta.

The Dutch came with a very infinite and youthful team, without the Dutch-known 4-3-3, and many had doubts about their ability to advance to this event. However, Van Gaal managed to make a set that is difficult to accept and Robben's speed and the experience of Van Persi and Snejder succeeded in winning 3 victories in the first phase against opponents like Spain and Chile, to turn the game against the Australians.

I think this game is extremely balanced. I can not see the Netherlands as a favorite, since the Europeans have so far been limited to playing a game of counter-attacks against teams that have either purely aggressive intentions or a slow center. But with Mexico things will not be exactly like that. For the first time they will face a team that chokes the opponent in the center and for the first time they will need to have the ball on their feet and have to create something.

Maybe the fight goes into prolongation, maybe Mexico can do it and from the normal run to throw the Dutch on the canvas. It is also the fact that the fight is in Brazil, which gives an advantage to the Mexicans. I think the performance so as not to lose Mexico is big enough.

The second battle between Latin Americans in the 16 phase and here the most important event is out-of-competition, since after the punishment of Luis Suarez the balance between the two teams has changed.

I have rewritten the importance of Liverpool's striker for the Uruguayan team. When they fought without him against Costa Rica, Uruguay was a funny team that accepted the defeat from Costa Rica despite being found ahead of 1-0.

I do not expect to be much better in this game. They may have passed by excluding England and Italy, but the truth is that neither England nor Italy have shown themselves to be teams belonging to the elite of the organization. On the contrary, they showed to be well below the average level. Uruguay qualified very hard, winning only the Italians in the last ten minutes, and did not show at any point in the tournament that they were in good shape.

Colombia again, was one of the most impressive teams in the first phase. Although they do not have huge names in their composition, they have a lot of energy in the field and they are constantly running causing many problems to the opponents and making it difficult for the opponent to play the ball. 

Apart from the fact that Colombia is currently at a much better level both as a group and as a readiness, it is a fact that Suarez's absence for me completely changes the balance of the couple. The truth is that I was about to bet on Uruguay's qualification when the pair became known. But I think Colombia's victory should be worthwhile to be given to 1.80. 

The Latin American battle opens Brazil's 16 stage on Saturday and is expected to be a multiplayer game.

The question in this game I do not think is who will qualify. Personally, I find it very difficult to impossible to exclude Brazil from so early and within her home. The right question is whether Brazil will at last give out the football that can or will continue the weaker appearances in the previous round.

Chile is not just an easy opponent. He showed in the group stage that he would be a hard nut for all and that regardless of the results they would have given 100% of their strength to the pitch. In the previous phase, they took full advantage of the poor status of the Spaniards and so they easily got the qualification. But in the crucial game with Holland the truth is that they were disappointed. They were unable to trouble their opponents and the counterattacks were betrayed by their poor defense, which is also the weak point of the team.

I think the importance of the moment and the dynamics of the opponent require Brazil to play at 100% of its strength and that it is time to show some of their virtues in the world. As I see it, I expect Brazil to have control from the start and Chile to confine itself to a defensive role. Chile's poor defense will probably judge a lot in the match. Even if Chile surprises and wants to take the upper hand in control of the game, the counterattacks will be vulnerable.

I expect Brazil to find the way to open the score and then to catch up with a cat-mouse game, hitting the counter-attacks and holding the ball for a long time in the center and away from her defense. Somehow they will find chances for a second goal and can cover the handicap and win with 2 goal difference.

Belgium may have secured its entry to the next stage, but it has not secured the first place in the group and there is no better way to end one in the first place than to make 3 at 3 and have a flawless first phase in this World Cup.

The opponent thinks he is offered to win his third victory in Belgium. The South Koreans have shown absolutely nothing in this event, no matter how hard they have tried. They hope to qualify, theoretically, always because of an Akinfeev error. The truth is that hopes for qualifying do not. But as Asians of East Asia, they will not go into the game to lose, they will give a good performance and try to get a good result for their story.

The Belgians have already begun to think of continuity. Wilmots will make some freshening changes and protect players like Witsel who has cards. Lukaku, after his defeats in the game with Russia and his miserable presence so far, is expected to stay on the bench. But when the bench has players like Januzaj. Origi, Miralas is hard to miss a lot on the quality side of the pitch.

The Belgians seem to be a better team and can win the win against a group worse than them.

After two tragic fights and two very bad appearances, Russia has somehow managed to hold the case for the next phase. With a victory today against Algeria, it is going to the next stage, since it seems unlikely that Korea will win with 2 goal difference Belgium.

Based on the image of the two teams so far, there is nothing to thwart the game in favor of the Russians. The Algerians have shown more livelier and more ready for the games they have given, have managed to score goals in both races, and generally seem to have a shot that succeeds. Europeans look out of place and time. Unable to run without imagination, like drowning in the heat and humidity of Brazil.

But here we are dealing with the World Cup. Just as Greece managed to turn a situation that it showed against her, so can Russia play a good game and leave for the next phase and knock out. Capello's choices have so far been considered as strange. Players such as Dzagoev, Zhirkov, Kerzhakov are not their key choices until now, and there are certainly choices for Capello and possibilities for Russia to do better and find solutions to its problems.

I believe that while we have seen Algeria at its best level, we have not seen Russia play its 50 skills. The Russians still have something to give and if they do not give it to this game then they will not have other opportunities. There is a recent tradition that wants Russia to win the teams in North Africa. This tradition was launched by 2002's World Cup and the 2-0 victory over Tunisia, and only recently in friendly preparation had no trouble defecting Morocco with 2-0.

I have in mind and this feature that the Arabs have to sail in the great moment. It will not be the first time that this is done and certainly the Algerians do not have the experience to be able to keep their concentration and dynamism if they find themselves in a difficult moment in the race. 

It is most likely that the Arabs get into the game to keep 0-0, if they put up a counter-attack to score in some way, but they will not get any risks. If Russia is able to play a good game, then I see it very difficult for Algeria to get the draw that it wants, since they will find a way to score either in a staged phase or in a good combination. I see value in odds over 2.00.

The last game for Honduras' favorite team in this World Cup and maybe the ceremonial bet on the race cards could be missing, after some time it is natural to push it. However, when you see that Argentine Nestor Pitana is the referee and the limit is at 3, you can only bet.

Pitana is by far the best Argentine referee and what makes him stand out is that he works under the letter of the law. In the game of Korea with Russia managed to take 4 yellow, while in the match America with Portugal was limited to one, although he had opportunities to pull out another two. Meanwhile, 5 has a yellow average and has not yet reached its record.

The only thing I'm afraid of is the game becomes friendly. Switzerland is hardly going to be ruled out because the draw will be OK, Honduras must win with 3-0 and wait to lose Ecuador, so the motivation for the match is not too long.

On the other hand, I doubt if the Central Americans can play with some other way of playing over a lot of wood. And the Swiss are not really good kids and they will definitely answer a challenge. I believe that 3 cards will be seen in the race, and I will also try the 3.5 at best.

One-sided interest in this game, since Iran wants the victory to hope for qualification while Bosnia waits for the whistle of the referee to get on the plane and return home.

But there is an incentive on both sides, for sure Bosnians would not want to leave without points from their first World Cup. But I do not know if this is enough to be able to win today the much inferior but much more depressed Iran.

Queiroz is a big bet because he can no longer suck in his team's defensive play, but he has to find a way to play aggressively, create opportunities and put the qualifying goal. The crash for the Asians is that they do not have remarkable aggressors. Both Dejagah and Ghoochannejhad are not what we call outsiders. Young Ansarifard does not seem to win the spot in the base line, so the weight falls on the two olds, Shojaei and Nekounam.

Both players are average, but they can score either with a foul or with a long shot. There was a time when Nekounam was Iran's only scorer in consecutive wins with 1-0. He scored either headed or shot off the field. 

Racing, Bosnia has not shown anything in this World Cup. So far, they have reminded Panathinaikos of Bake. A team that seems to be unable to adapt to the Brazilian conditions, has no breaths and shows no speed and spirits. Misimovic seems to be doing well in China and does not seem to be close to his good, while Dzeko can not get the team on his back.

Bad lies, Iran has so far shown itself to be a better group or at least more ready for Bosnia. They run a lot and can melt the Balkans and exhaust them early. Whether it will be able to score Iran is the question of the fight. 3.80 should be in 2.60, so I can only bet and wait to see the replies on the pitch.