I see a general deprecation of the buck for Uzbekistan, while I read and funny analyzes from late "Asians" about the quality of this group. It is true that the team suffers defensively, but with opponents who, in order to score a goal, have to make ten classic chances and five quad-a-quads have a good chance of keeping their focus clean or even not eating too much. As far as their medium-term competencies are concerned, you do not have to have a sharp eye to find out that they are among the few East people who know what's in place. Good players of the ball, with diabetes and shootout, do not need much preliminary to break the door and this was apparent from the first two games (2-1) and (4-0) !
A match is critical to me and concerns the next phase. Saudi Arabia or Australia will probably be the rival, while for the four I think it will be slightly more "passable". The easiest I would be to be one of the favorites to win the trophy, but I'm not here for such "reasonable" choices. For the quality of the Uzbeks, I estimate that the @41 performance to conquer with Each-way * * in 1 / 3 is quite excessive.
* For this bet we choose to conquer Uzbekistan and click on the E / W box. Playing eg 1ε the bet is doubled (becomes 2ε) having essentially covered the case for our team to go to the final but not to win it. If he wins it we win 55,33 e, if he loses the final we win 14,33ε while if it is ruled out earlier of course we lose 2ε.